In recent days, we observed by the university a most undemocratic and dishonest tactics. The PR office of the Friedrich Schiller University of Jena tried in the public the information to spread, the squatters in Lecture Hall 4 would avoid dialogue with the university administration, during which the University of exactly this dialogue would look. This information is not true and we want this show on the example of a currently planned panel discussion.
On Friday 27 November, informed us of the Student Council on the talks if the university management to us. Proposed was not a joint public conversation, in which 3 representatives of the squatters, 3 representatives and 3 representatives of the student council of regents. The student informed us of another that was called by the university administration an ultimatum for release of the lecture hall, but at the same time we took the press that the university administration claimed to have called an ultimatum.
The plenary lecture in four decided on the same day a change for the planned talks. We do not reject public debates behind closed doors, right in such non-transparent and non-democratic processes, we demonstrate even date! So we invited one of the Unileitung to a panel discussion attended by the public to discuss our demands.
On Tuesday 1 December, we were again on the Student Council a blackmail proposal on the proposed panel discussion: The Unileitung refused to enter into dialogue with us as long as we keep the lecture hall filled. We categorically rejected this proposal. Although the Unileitung in the Public has indicated willingness to talk, she refused to talk to us.
On yesterday we got another offer from the university. We were invited to a panel discussion with a representative of the squatters, a representative of the student representatives and a representative of the Student Council. In contrast to 3 representatives of the University take place. The University is now urging an evacuation of the area and threatens us with a criminal complaint and police clearance. We very much regret if students who are actively committed to improving conditions at the university is threatened with criminal prosecution. However, we are on this approach by Rector BBW from the last strike formation used in which the principal threatened students who occupied his office, with de-registration. Also in this last incident, the university administration lied to the public and tried to blackmail her hand to interpret the part of students.
We explicitly related to false information, some of which were passed by communication problems and by the Sturas, after the protesters were not ready to talk. This statement is fundamentally wrong.
From the press we had seen yesterday that Secretary of State Deufel would now meet with students in Jena. We regret very much that this is not related the occupants is because we have so far received no information about this meeting. Obviously try politics and university leadership to influence public opinion with false information. We warn all the parties expressly lies, this is not a democratic means and will fly up in the short time each time.
Slowly we have enough of contradictory statements on the part of Mr. (thickness), which sits in the largest university political lobbies of the Republic, as well as President in the Coimbra Group . Only last summer, told us Mr. Big he would reject tuition fees, but this appears given the approach of the HRK (HRK) whose Vice President he is just lip service. The HRK advocates including greater involvement of universities in the selection of students, the introduction of tuition fees and the Excellence Initiative of the Federal Government. The HRK operates a number of projects, including the Bologna Center and the project quality management.
She founded jointly with the Bertelsmann Foundation, the nonprofit Center for Higher Education Development (CHE), headquartered in Gütersloh, which was for "University Rankings" even the data of nearly all the students and the public opinion through "studies" and PR Tatkiken manipulated the Department 3 of the University of Siegen (language, literature and media studies), for example taking in July in part not on the CHE-ranking, on the grounds that the procedures give the creeping private companies the ability to control public education in practice and it democratic control to escape. The ranking promotes inequality between schools. It promotes (quote) "the decoupling of research and teaching and to assist in the dismantling of the traditional strengths of German higher education system."
Again in brief:
We want to communicate to communicate claims
The Unileitung
communicates the Unileitung not.
Yours Sincerely
The formation strikers
0 comments:
Post a Comment