are the Flyers for the start! Week.
Sunday, December 13, 2009
Friday, December 11, 2009
Magnet Earings Walmart
Craft Sunday (exhibition on education strike)
Hello strike sympathizers willing and tinkering,
an exhibition on the student strike - QUO VADIS EDUCATION STRIKE? - work out, that is the task on Sunday. Comes with all
scissors
ideas
mood
craft materials, if you want.
Also with: PICTURES
PRESS RELEASES DOCUMENTS
EARLY FLYER (including digital artwork)
WE NEED YOU!
Therefore:
Hello strike sympathizers willing and tinkering,
an exhibition on the student strike - QUO VADIS EDUCATION STRIKE? - work out, that is the task on Sunday. Comes with all
scissors
ideas
mood
craft materials, if you want.
Also with: PICTURES
PRESS RELEASES DOCUMENTS
EARLY FLYER (including digital artwork)
WE NEED YOU!
Therefore:
Sunday CZS 3 HS 4 16.00
Thursday, December 10, 2009
Pokemon Furrry Doujin
Between Culture Ministers Conference in Bonn and panel discussion in Jena
Jena, 10.12.2009
The text is written with the knowledge of the concerns of the protests and shows similarities in reasoning and thinking structures between the KMK and the HRK, which met today gemeinam, and the participants of yesterday's panel discussion by the Executive Board of the Friedrich-Schiller-University and representatives of the Thuringian State Government. At the panel discussion was the Rector's Office charged, in response to the protests. On student Side sat two people, for the student strike and one man for the student councils and the Student Council. Thus, this text follows two objectives: the critique of the paper adopted today by the KMK and the criticism of the speeches of Unileitung and the State Secretary to the panel discussion. Your prospects will be mirrored on the basis of the ideals and requirements of education strikers.
The Standing Conference (KMK) met today with the Rectors' Conference (HRK) in Bonn. Result was an attempt at appeasement by a staged act of responding to the demands of protests by means of a "corner-paper". Such a document signed of HRK and KMK first is nothing more than a text, an expression of a recommendation, not a promise, not a law. The media like to write then giving hope to the new study "will" now reformed, everything "is" better now, the big ones have something "done". Such a paper is often written to reassure the opposition, and unfortunately it has in the past a lot of work too often. This will not be the case this time, as will stay awake to many eyes.
demonstrations and blockades in Bonn
After weeks of occupations, demonstrations, activities and discussions of the formation of strike today again mobilized to a nationwide demonstration in Bonn. On the demonstration (or demonstrations) in the now-cool wet Bonn were on 7ooo - met 1oooo people - the press and the police as is often claimed that it was only half. Students, pupils, apprentices, unemployed, trade unionists and teachers articulated their protest against poor working, learning and study conditions, against the commodification of education, against the loss of democracy, against the lack of will to make more funds available, a limitation of self-determined acquisition of knowledge and against the barriers of access to education.
buses and trains traveled at least 30 cities to Bonn, also from Jena lead a bus. From Berlin, where coincided today a solidarity demo, even drove 20 buses. Coming from Mainz in the morning put the boat on education with 250 students on the banks of the Brass. On the trip were there overnight on board workshops and music from the band "Doktorjewski. Together they moved to the University of Bonn. "Standing detention"
to demonstrate and protest under the creative name was loaded by 13 clock, but overall were at least three demos pending. The mass demonstration lasted about two hours. In the afternoon there were several blockades of roads (both ends of the Ahrstraße, exit the cemetery Gotenstraße, Central Street intersections and the Albert Kahn-way). It was at least two sedans with ministers from the traffic is cut off and have them actually get detention. The police would have liked to have, but not cleared. After reports of protesters came from the police force by selective use of pepper spray. About Twitter news came in from the Albert Kahn-way in the police with sticks "in all" skin and tear gas began. To be part of the victims were then treated in the hospital. In the early evening was not known how serious the injuries were. Another post about Twitter, writes that two demo clowns were arrested. Overall, however, the Demo by many participants as a quiet, full of good mood and perceived by many people as a success.
demonstrations of solidarity, consents and monopolization
The demonstration of how the whole movement for weeks, driven primarily by active students, pupils and trainees. But the demonstrations of solidarity are very many. Professors and teaching, academics and labor rights, civil rights and many other organizations increasingly agree to the motion.
The trade union side had called for the demonstration. The Trade Union of Education and Science (GEW), called the rally a rechtsbindlichen access to master's programs and said on an alliance between teachers and students. In addition, the GEW talk long for more time for education, against debt and consolidation of programs, individual support for all students, more teachers and more equitable working conditions. The first concession of HRK and KMK evaluates the GEW success as the first part of the educational strike. Also earning was supported by Actions and logistical support the demonstrations, they see the demands of protesters, some seriously. Verdi argues for the abolition of tuition fees and for a commodification of higher education and study aims.
Attac Germany and the no-global youth movement Noya support the demonstration in Bonn. The scientific advisory board expressed its solidarity with the student strike. ["The Bologna process and the concomitant commodification of education have failed unequivocally. Start now has a new design process in which the democratic participation of all stakeholders is ensured. Therefore we are in the protests today that," said Max Bank, representatives of Noya watching the nationwide coordination group Attac.]
Yet for all the support you have, who supports what points of the protest to try to make use of the motion and shape in their image. Especially the big parties, the media and state and federal government but also the HRK HRK and institutions such as the CHE or INSM spin around the demands for better education in their own terms and its own neo-liberal thought patterns.
conservatives and neo-liberal perspectives on the protest
from conservative and (neo) liberal circles are welcomed the protests as from the perspective of the formation of the human mind time, less pressure and more flexibility, but their goal is absolutely contrary to a central criticism of the strike: The human mind, an educated mind to be made by them primarily as a chance to see the global competition among business locations. Education and science are seen as a Productive force. Therefore, current government, but many rectors occur hardly ever for an extension of the Bachelor, the bachelor, whose name for a long time still negative swing is that is not even recognized in the economy and in itself a paradox as a professional degree and science preparation is applied.
appealed For example, the FDP to the CMC, the protests do not lightly dismiss it as slapstick. But they reject "unrealistic ultimatums" from creating it in their limited thinking is not to question social structures only. In addition, the FDP proposes a "purification" of the courses as a solution of the pressure in study before. "Purification" the great word of the reform proposals by politicians of FDP, the CDU and SPD seems to be also of rectors and other 'experts'. They argue that the problem is the shortness of the time, but the uniformity of the contents of the former two more years of studies. An apt response was on the 'Assembly' at FSU on 25.11.2009 replies from a student to pediatric patients expression of Mario Voigt (CDU), the acting chairman of the Thuringian Parliament Committee for Education, Science and Research: "Please do not even less content! "
education and science in the global competition
Margret Wintermantel, President HRK, so probably well known thickness with Rector Klaus spoke out frankly what is the goal of better study conditions: "This is about the future of the country. We are keen that the students can complete a qualitative study. "An obsession with competition between universities and international competition in the Dean of the FSU seems to be a starting point for their opinions and decisions to be. Tuition fees in favor of Vice President for Academic and structure Kurt-Dieter Koschmieder not directly, but they could not make a substantial financial advantage over other universities, He said the one in the press conference on Tuesday (with the addition of this to do not necessarily have as large in the press).
A note on the views of Rector thickness is also a text of 2004 entitled "The University in the global competition." One is to invest more in science and research required to force the "build and maintain the global competitiveness of the university." Harrsch to criticism from the education strike would probably encounter the following passage: "Germany in particular is better or worse dependent on globalization as an opportunity. This is especially true for the university, from a reaffirmation of their spirit, that is, to encourage their productive and competitive forces. "
the protesters is not about a future capacity of the country in terms of a successful existence and enforcement in a global economic competition, and more about the human mind as such and as reason for a more just, more livable world, and values such as democracy and equality in itself.
Practical Criticism welcome but please no social criticism
The practical proposals of the protest, they could well use, say the representatives of the recent higher education reforms, which repeatedly assert that they could not do anything that Bologna reforms would have it be implemented. The Jena Unileitung sees himself as a guinea pig, the requirements of the policies for implementing the Bachelor-/Master-Systems but also no guidelines, concepts and experience reports would therefore be attacked, maybe you love to vo Tips from Bertelsmann (CHE) and INSM. Yes, and even if such impotence is so, where were the presidents and what has he done to the HRK and since 1999, when the Bologna Process was put on paper. This paper was a conspiracy by European governments and is not (!) Once legally binding. And, the HRK in the chorus of international flexibility and more effective science joined in and raised the Bologna Process an idol of modern education. All the better, they say if they would get from the students the "empiricism" that lead them to evaluate and improve the accreditation of courses of study and the Bologna reforms a success (O-Ton Rector Klaus thickness) need.
Even Margaret Wintermantel said after the KMK its offer of dialogue with the students with the same implications from: ". We also need the experience of the students," They include seemingly less democratic participation of all parties, but rather the use of the student experience to implementation of the reform, according to the allegations by the Unileitung also on the panel discussion yesterday as the goal of Universiät See, even though as a reason for the difficulties in implementation of its own called minor conviction and the too small "flame for reform" (press conference on Tuesday) for those affected by the university. But a democratic discussion of all stakeholders, not just the professors and student individual insurance Terter would probably be the refusal may lead to the Bologna goals.
So when it comes to useful criticism, then they are welcome to them. But this "unworldly" thought of the protest not use in conservative and liberal circles it. It was not a matter for universities to pursue social criticism, said Rector thickness of the panel discussion yesterday. You'll hear how the argument goes further: That is a matter of policy. Policy should of course take place in forums, protests, although not wrong, but the work should have the choice to take over "democratic representatives. could "So you speak with representatives, please enter in the forums, get an office, then I talk with you." Something like that you pointed describe the concept of democracy, which unfortunately also vehemently thickness of the FSU-Chancellor Klaus and represented the Thuringia State Secretary Thomas Deufel science at yesterday's panel discussion. New forms democracy, as they stimulate the protesters and demand, are not efficient or effective, we must take a targeted approach, since one can not now involve all times. In general are indeed in all processes student representatives have been involved (yes 3 or 4).
Even Klaus Dicke admitted to the panel discussion that he and the strikers had a completely different, incompatible with each other democracy. Democratic legitimacy is for the Lord thickness only elected representatives, all others are not recognized as a political voice. Such a limited imagination in democracy you expect from a political scientist with a good knowledge of political history of ideas not. But to such a position to get comfortable when you sit in such undemocratic bodies such as the Rector or the HRK to the top. Bring it but nothing to talk about democracy, including Secretary of State Deufel. And then - again Mr. Big - yet all this criticism of capitalism, one can not just abolish the whole capitalism.
But back to KMK and HRK - called the "democratic" bodies
in the title of today's press release HRK it! Ministry of Education and Rectors' Conference together act "Together we are strong, seems to be the motto, as a protest movement is even greater. Together to make a kick that would not be carried out more than one test per module, that there was a "realistic and reasonable" level of burden on students that examinations would be upheld in higher education and that the study would be more flexible. In addition, we wanted to try to reach 10% of GDP on education.
Apart from the lack of binding of a paper: The points of the KMK and HRK have agreed in their Tagunssaal comprising no substantial nationwide articulate demands and proposals, nor can one be content with the various points so easily satisfied.
criticism of the reform document of the KMK and HRK
The detained reduction of tests is strongly welcomed as such. Instead, testing should scientific work such as lectures, discussions, essays, research and research reports as well as longer writings form the basis of the studies. But the paper is missing the valuation of certain types of examinations. A requirement of the Jena education strike is set as the elimination of multiple-choice exams, which do not require independent thinking and applying just the ability to learn by heart, a little logical thinking and cross's.
will also target the rigid rules on the 6-semester Bachelor in favor of a "continuous" and "flexible" design of the course be changed to the master. The total number of 10 terms should remain. Thus, the strict time constraint of studies, reproduced. There are countless reasons why people take longer than five years to study or do. We remind you again that until the 6os not even exist periods of study in universities in Germany. Then, as in previous years, the gradual limitation of the study period there were economic interests and sometimes financial situations that motivated the legislative changes.
Admission to the master's program, after the admission, the CMC continues today by the universities be limited to "quality assurance" or capacity reasons. If at risk for a scientific education, the "quality" of teaching, as one should rather not help but think about, namely how the conditions of employment and the number of teachers can be increased. But unfortunately, politicians are rarely creative expertise in designing the company and the distribution of funds. So continue for most of a less quality bachelor's degree.
tuition, economization - no issues
over the abolition of tuition fees had one day to the KMK not first discussed, at least not in press releases, interviews or paper. What should they say? In their perception of importance and appreciation of the inter-nation alien competition for power, for profit and return to medals for scientific and 'performance' tuition fees are vorteilverschaffende instruments.
One or the other Social Democrat Secretary of State Thomas Deufel as well as science, which justified at yesterday's panel discussion Long-time tuition, provides a long-term tuition fees as an act of social justice, since it is indeed the better-off who are studying. Similarly, argued by some also like to generally in terms tuition fees. It is almost an honorable social justice idea were it not for the reality: Even for many of the mediocre 'good sized' families are tuition fees a heavy load up a hurdle, and to students without parental support and for the many low-cost studying almost impossible.
criticism of the commodification of higher education - the increasing influence of business on the research, dependence on external funds, enterprise and market-like conception of higher education and science (Key words: higher education, the service, service, supply and demand, international competition, ranking, recoverability of Science, etc.) - seems at the KMK and the HRK to get little or understood. gave remarks on this issue it from them today no.
Rector tried thick even on the panel discussion also rejected the accusations of support of economization. According to him, find an effect of the economy rather than solely in contract research, funding per se are not a problem, but a necessity and a help, and Unirat only two representatives would sit out of the economy (which is true: but that all things, a former CEO of Carl Zeiss and a board member of Siemens must be ...). That were articulated by the squatters criticism of the university as undemocratic Body (not students and faculty with voting rights) and as a means of curtailing autonomy for the 2 / 3 occupation by external, "said Klaus thickness, the Council decides anyway. Although the Unirat actually equipped with few skills, but his influence management, personnel issues and fundamental issues should not be underestimated.
On the side of the strikers aud The panel also criticized the university that they could increasingly seen as a business and science as a market and organize what you observe in words and concepts such as science market, demand and demand and quality management. Then said Klaus Dicke middle of a word confident and energetic, he was always against the quality management. A look at his thoughts on the grants panel discussion Qualitässteuerung 2006 HRK on where it appears that the claim is probably not quite right
"We have a whole set of procedures and assessment standards [...], you may apply. [...] Where it is used? This is the distribution of resources in research, but that is every single appeal. As an element of quality control I would call the appeal always comes first. "Quality measurement (evaluation) usually takes place quantitatively, but if money distribution and placement of sets of publications, depend citations positive ratings increased, both objectively and subjectively, the pressure on teachers and researchers. It's been known for years, at least in the institutes. On Accreditation of courses the article gives a more interesting note:
"[...] we must focus especially in the peak areas of what can be offered on the market for new subjects and new subject combinations. Since we must look to the standards that are now just querying the professional market. Also, is largely a European. "If that to be the primary maxims of Unileitung, one wonders how they can only come to the conclusion Can influence the economy only through contract research.
Not only these sensitive processes of commodification are also reflected by HRK and governments hardly. Other key topics of the student strike movement, such as abolition of precarious working conditions and low pay, or the extension of democratic participation of students and employees are scientists, apparently at the KMK and the HRK hardly worth mentioning.
What brought this day
show in a brilliant phrase from today's press release of the HRK 'decision makers' their 'benevolence' and democratic understanding: "Standing Conference Rectors' Conference and to criticisms of the students to the Bologna process have taken and decisions made. You are who believe that it is time again to move to a regulated studying. "This sentence says well again in the clearest, how democratic our" democratically elected representatives "so. We have not done what you wanted, now are quiet again. No, we will not! For too many missing and nothing was done today.
Well, what does this day? Guardian of shows definitely effect as success can not be won this paper directly, this has to happen more. But indirectly these reactions are still a success. But this paper shows appeasement that the Minister of Education and the principals are afraid. Fear that the movement is even stronger, that they still vigorously insists on managing the social and cultural causes of the problems. Maybe they are afraid that the students and the students continue to join forces with their teachers and lecturers, or even, as happened today at the demonstration before, with workers and the unemployed. But no one can stop this process more. The lecturers and teachers will not have to hide with their criticism, they have become one of many that will strengthen the back.
Federal Education Minister Annette Schavan invites the way to Bologna summit in April. Until then, this paper could even implemented, and further steps will be decreased. The contents of the protesters still have to be clearly formulated and articulated the thoughts and ideas need to be further disseminated in the public and discussed and observed the political processes vigilant and well commented. April is probably a good time to review the training again to take to the streets because they are now written on paper and not enough lines of attack at the Jena Unileitung one comes with some concerns probably continue to granite. With small concessions can not be satisfied if the problems at the root (radix - Are packed too radical).
KMK Chairman Henry Tesch (CDU) and HRK-President Margaret Wintermantel emphasized similar to openly display leading officials yesterday Jena panel discussion on the need for cooperation with the students and expressed their belief to find "common workable solutions." The student strike movement to be careful now very pleased that the 'busy' guide members of federal, state and university again not only with a few students from the committees work and continue to play a much more prominent role. It is a dialogue between students and between students and lecturers press ahead with a dialogue of bodies not belonging may be limited. The energy of the protest must be converted into a positive force of action, debate and thought. We can work no longer "them up there," left to their links with cliques and their shared world views are possible only with difficulty thinking and understanding what is being articulated by the protesters for years.
Sources:
HRK press release 10.12.
Focus on 10.12.
radio utopia on the KMK on 10.12.
FDP release 10.12.
GEW press release 10.12.
declaration of solidarity of the Scientific Advisory Board of ATTAC
call for demonstration in Bonn for the Standing Conference
A report from the demo
page KMK demonstration in Bonn
photos from the demo
Klaus Thickness: "The University in the global competition" in the GEW reader to the 13th State Higher Education Conference . Thuringian universities in the maelstrom of financial misery. Erfurt 2005th P. 29-33.
Klaus Dicke: contributions to the panel discussion "From the quality of teaching for quality development as a principle of university management - a location determination. " In: HRK - contributions to the university policy 12/2007 Quality-oriented higher education management and external standards . Contributions to an event of the project Quality Assurance of University Rectors Conference on 2./3.11.2006 in Bonn. 
Jena, 10.12.2009
The text is written with the knowledge of the concerns of the protests and shows similarities in reasoning and thinking structures between the KMK and the HRK, which met today gemeinam, and the participants of yesterday's panel discussion by the Executive Board of the Friedrich-Schiller-University and representatives of the Thuringian State Government. At the panel discussion was the Rector's Office charged, in response to the protests. On student Side sat two people, for the student strike and one man for the student councils and the Student Council. Thus, this text follows two objectives: the critique of the paper adopted today by the KMK and the criticism of the speeches of Unileitung and the State Secretary to the panel discussion. Your prospects will be mirrored on the basis of the ideals and requirements of education strikers.
The Standing Conference (KMK) met today with the Rectors' Conference (HRK) in Bonn. Result was an attempt at appeasement by a staged act of responding to the demands of protests by means of a "corner-paper". Such a document signed of HRK and KMK first is nothing more than a text, an expression of a recommendation, not a promise, not a law. The media like to write then giving hope to the new study "will" now reformed, everything "is" better now, the big ones have something "done". Such a paper is often written to reassure the opposition, and unfortunately it has in the past a lot of work too often. This will not be the case this time, as will stay awake to many eyes.
demonstrations and blockades in Bonn
After weeks of occupations, demonstrations, activities and discussions of the formation of strike today again mobilized to a nationwide demonstration in Bonn. On the demonstration (or demonstrations) in the now-cool wet Bonn were on 7ooo - met 1oooo people - the press and the police as is often claimed that it was only half. Students, pupils, apprentices, unemployed, trade unionists and teachers articulated their protest against poor working, learning and study conditions, against the commodification of education, against the loss of democracy, against the lack of will to make more funds available, a limitation of self-determined acquisition of knowledge and against the barriers of access to education.
buses and trains traveled at least 30 cities to Bonn, also from Jena lead a bus. From Berlin, where coincided today a solidarity demo, even drove 20 buses. Coming from Mainz in the morning put the boat on education with 250 students on the banks of the Brass. On the trip were there overnight on board workshops and music from the band "Doktorjewski. Together they moved to the University of Bonn. "Standing detention"
to demonstrate and protest under the creative name was loaded by 13 clock, but overall were at least three demos pending. The mass demonstration lasted about two hours. In the afternoon there were several blockades of roads (both ends of the Ahrstraße, exit the cemetery Gotenstraße, Central Street intersections and the Albert Kahn-way). It was at least two sedans with ministers from the traffic is cut off and have them actually get detention. The police would have liked to have, but not cleared. After reports of protesters came from the police force by selective use of pepper spray. About Twitter news came in from the Albert Kahn-way in the police with sticks "in all" skin and tear gas began. To be part of the victims were then treated in the hospital. In the early evening was not known how serious the injuries were. Another post about Twitter, writes that two demo clowns were arrested. Overall, however, the Demo by many participants as a quiet, full of good mood and perceived by many people as a success.
demonstrations of solidarity, consents and monopolization
The demonstration of how the whole movement for weeks, driven primarily by active students, pupils and trainees. But the demonstrations of solidarity are very many. Professors and teaching, academics and labor rights, civil rights and many other organizations increasingly agree to the motion.
The trade union side had called for the demonstration. The Trade Union of Education and Science (GEW), called the rally a rechtsbindlichen access to master's programs and said on an alliance between teachers and students. In addition, the GEW talk long for more time for education, against debt and consolidation of programs, individual support for all students, more teachers and more equitable working conditions. The first concession of HRK and KMK evaluates the GEW success as the first part of the educational strike. Also earning was supported by Actions and logistical support the demonstrations, they see the demands of protesters, some seriously. Verdi argues for the abolition of tuition fees and for a commodification of higher education and study aims.
Attac Germany and the no-global youth movement Noya support the demonstration in Bonn. The scientific advisory board expressed its solidarity with the student strike. ["The Bologna process and the concomitant commodification of education have failed unequivocally. Start now has a new design process in which the democratic participation of all stakeholders is ensured. Therefore we are in the protests today that," said Max Bank, representatives of Noya watching the nationwide coordination group Attac.]
Yet for all the support you have, who supports what points of the protest to try to make use of the motion and shape in their image. Especially the big parties, the media and state and federal government but also the HRK HRK and institutions such as the CHE or INSM spin around the demands for better education in their own terms and its own neo-liberal thought patterns.
conservatives and neo-liberal perspectives on the protest
from conservative and (neo) liberal circles are welcomed the protests as from the perspective of the formation of the human mind time, less pressure and more flexibility, but their goal is absolutely contrary to a central criticism of the strike: The human mind, an educated mind to be made by them primarily as a chance to see the global competition among business locations. Education and science are seen as a Productive force. Therefore, current government, but many rectors occur hardly ever for an extension of the Bachelor, the bachelor, whose name for a long time still negative swing is that is not even recognized in the economy and in itself a paradox as a professional degree and science preparation is applied.
appealed For example, the FDP to the CMC, the protests do not lightly dismiss it as slapstick. But they reject "unrealistic ultimatums" from creating it in their limited thinking is not to question social structures only. In addition, the FDP proposes a "purification" of the courses as a solution of the pressure in study before. "Purification" the great word of the reform proposals by politicians of FDP, the CDU and SPD seems to be also of rectors and other 'experts'. They argue that the problem is the shortness of the time, but the uniformity of the contents of the former two more years of studies. An apt response was on the 'Assembly' at FSU on 25.11.2009 replies from a student to pediatric patients expression of Mario Voigt (CDU), the acting chairman of the Thuringian Parliament Committee for Education, Science and Research: "Please do not even less content! "
education and science in the global competition
Margret Wintermantel, President HRK, so probably well known thickness with Rector Klaus spoke out frankly what is the goal of better study conditions: "This is about the future of the country. We are keen that the students can complete a qualitative study. "An obsession with competition between universities and international competition in the Dean of the FSU seems to be a starting point for their opinions and decisions to be. Tuition fees in favor of Vice President for Academic and structure Kurt-Dieter Koschmieder not directly, but they could not make a substantial financial advantage over other universities, He said the one in the press conference on Tuesday (with the addition of this to do not necessarily have as large in the press).
A note on the views of Rector thickness is also a text of 2004 entitled "The University in the global competition." One is to invest more in science and research required to force the "build and maintain the global competitiveness of the university." Harrsch to criticism from the education strike would probably encounter the following passage: "Germany in particular is better or worse dependent on globalization as an opportunity. This is especially true for the university, from a reaffirmation of their spirit, that is, to encourage their productive and competitive forces. "
the protesters is not about a future capacity of the country in terms of a successful existence and enforcement in a global economic competition, and more about the human mind as such and as reason for a more just, more livable world, and values such as democracy and equality in itself.
Practical Criticism welcome but please no social criticism
The practical proposals of the protest, they could well use, say the representatives of the recent higher education reforms, which repeatedly assert that they could not do anything that Bologna reforms would have it be implemented. The Jena Unileitung sees himself as a guinea pig, the requirements of the policies for implementing the Bachelor-/Master-Systems but also no guidelines, concepts and experience reports would therefore be attacked, maybe you love to vo Tips from Bertelsmann (CHE) and INSM. Yes, and even if such impotence is so, where were the presidents and what has he done to the HRK and since 1999, when the Bologna Process was put on paper. This paper was a conspiracy by European governments and is not (!) Once legally binding. And, the HRK in the chorus of international flexibility and more effective science joined in and raised the Bologna Process an idol of modern education. All the better, they say if they would get from the students the "empiricism" that lead them to evaluate and improve the accreditation of courses of study and the Bologna reforms a success (O-Ton Rector Klaus thickness) need.
Even Margaret Wintermantel said after the KMK its offer of dialogue with the students with the same implications from: ". We also need the experience of the students," They include seemingly less democratic participation of all parties, but rather the use of the student experience to implementation of the reform, according to the allegations by the Unileitung also on the panel discussion yesterday as the goal of Universiät See, even though as a reason for the difficulties in implementation of its own called minor conviction and the too small "flame for reform" (press conference on Tuesday) for those affected by the university. But a democratic discussion of all stakeholders, not just the professors and student individual insurance Terter would probably be the refusal may lead to the Bologna goals.
So when it comes to useful criticism, then they are welcome to them. But this "unworldly" thought of the protest not use in conservative and liberal circles it. It was not a matter for universities to pursue social criticism, said Rector thickness of the panel discussion yesterday. You'll hear how the argument goes further: That is a matter of policy. Policy should of course take place in forums, protests, although not wrong, but the work should have the choice to take over "democratic representatives. could "So you speak with representatives, please enter in the forums, get an office, then I talk with you." Something like that you pointed describe the concept of democracy, which unfortunately also vehemently thickness of the FSU-Chancellor Klaus and represented the Thuringia State Secretary Thomas Deufel science at yesterday's panel discussion. New forms democracy, as they stimulate the protesters and demand, are not efficient or effective, we must take a targeted approach, since one can not now involve all times. In general are indeed in all processes student representatives have been involved (yes 3 or 4).
Even Klaus Dicke admitted to the panel discussion that he and the strikers had a completely different, incompatible with each other democracy. Democratic legitimacy is for the Lord thickness only elected representatives, all others are not recognized as a political voice. Such a limited imagination in democracy you expect from a political scientist with a good knowledge of political history of ideas not. But to such a position to get comfortable when you sit in such undemocratic bodies such as the Rector or the HRK to the top. Bring it but nothing to talk about democracy, including Secretary of State Deufel. And then - again Mr. Big - yet all this criticism of capitalism, one can not just abolish the whole capitalism.
But back to KMK and HRK - called the "democratic" bodies
in the title of today's press release HRK it! Ministry of Education and Rectors' Conference together act "Together we are strong, seems to be the motto, as a protest movement is even greater. Together to make a kick that would not be carried out more than one test per module, that there was a "realistic and reasonable" level of burden on students that examinations would be upheld in higher education and that the study would be more flexible. In addition, we wanted to try to reach 10% of GDP on education.
Apart from the lack of binding of a paper: The points of the KMK and HRK have agreed in their Tagunssaal comprising no substantial nationwide articulate demands and proposals, nor can one be content with the various points so easily satisfied.
criticism of the reform document of the KMK and HRK
The detained reduction of tests is strongly welcomed as such. Instead, testing should scientific work such as lectures, discussions, essays, research and research reports as well as longer writings form the basis of the studies. But the paper is missing the valuation of certain types of examinations. A requirement of the Jena education strike is set as the elimination of multiple-choice exams, which do not require independent thinking and applying just the ability to learn by heart, a little logical thinking and cross's.
will also target the rigid rules on the 6-semester Bachelor in favor of a "continuous" and "flexible" design of the course be changed to the master. The total number of 10 terms should remain. Thus, the strict time constraint of studies, reproduced. There are countless reasons why people take longer than five years to study or do. We remind you again that until the 6os not even exist periods of study in universities in Germany. Then, as in previous years, the gradual limitation of the study period there were economic interests and sometimes financial situations that motivated the legislative changes.
Admission to the master's program, after the admission, the CMC continues today by the universities be limited to "quality assurance" or capacity reasons. If at risk for a scientific education, the "quality" of teaching, as one should rather not help but think about, namely how the conditions of employment and the number of teachers can be increased. But unfortunately, politicians are rarely creative expertise in designing the company and the distribution of funds. So continue for most of a less quality bachelor's degree.
tuition, economization - no issues
over the abolition of tuition fees had one day to the KMK not first discussed, at least not in press releases, interviews or paper. What should they say? In their perception of importance and appreciation of the inter-nation alien competition for power, for profit and return to medals for scientific and 'performance' tuition fees are vorteilverschaffende instruments.
One or the other Social Democrat Secretary of State Thomas Deufel as well as science, which justified at yesterday's panel discussion Long-time tuition, provides a long-term tuition fees as an act of social justice, since it is indeed the better-off who are studying. Similarly, argued by some also like to generally in terms tuition fees. It is almost an honorable social justice idea were it not for the reality: Even for many of the mediocre 'good sized' families are tuition fees a heavy load up a hurdle, and to students without parental support and for the many low-cost studying almost impossible.
criticism of the commodification of higher education - the increasing influence of business on the research, dependence on external funds, enterprise and market-like conception of higher education and science (Key words: higher education, the service, service, supply and demand, international competition, ranking, recoverability of Science, etc.) - seems at the KMK and the HRK to get little or understood. gave remarks on this issue it from them today no.
Rector tried thick even on the panel discussion also rejected the accusations of support of economization. According to him, find an effect of the economy rather than solely in contract research, funding per se are not a problem, but a necessity and a help, and Unirat only two representatives would sit out of the economy (which is true: but that all things, a former CEO of Carl Zeiss and a board member of Siemens must be ...). That were articulated by the squatters criticism of the university as undemocratic Body (not students and faculty with voting rights) and as a means of curtailing autonomy for the 2 / 3 occupation by external, "said Klaus thickness, the Council decides anyway. Although the Unirat actually equipped with few skills, but his influence management, personnel issues and fundamental issues should not be underestimated.
On the side of the strikers aud The panel also criticized the university that they could increasingly seen as a business and science as a market and organize what you observe in words and concepts such as science market, demand and demand and quality management. Then said Klaus Dicke middle of a word confident and energetic, he was always against the quality management. A look at his thoughts on the grants panel discussion Qualitässteuerung 2006 HRK on where it appears that the claim is probably not quite right
"We have a whole set of procedures and assessment standards [...], you may apply. [...] Where it is used? This is the distribution of resources in research, but that is every single appeal. As an element of quality control I would call the appeal always comes first. "Quality measurement (evaluation) usually takes place quantitatively, but if money distribution and placement of sets of publications, depend citations positive ratings increased, both objectively and subjectively, the pressure on teachers and researchers. It's been known for years, at least in the institutes. On Accreditation of courses the article gives a more interesting note:
"[...] we must focus especially in the peak areas of what can be offered on the market for new subjects and new subject combinations. Since we must look to the standards that are now just querying the professional market. Also, is largely a European. "If that to be the primary maxims of Unileitung, one wonders how they can only come to the conclusion Can influence the economy only through contract research.
Not only these sensitive processes of commodification are also reflected by HRK and governments hardly. Other key topics of the student strike movement, such as abolition of precarious working conditions and low pay, or the extension of democratic participation of students and employees are scientists, apparently at the KMK and the HRK hardly worth mentioning.
What brought this day
show in a brilliant phrase from today's press release of the HRK 'decision makers' their 'benevolence' and democratic understanding: "Standing Conference Rectors' Conference and to criticisms of the students to the Bologna process have taken and decisions made. You are who believe that it is time again to move to a regulated studying. "This sentence says well again in the clearest, how democratic our" democratically elected representatives "so. We have not done what you wanted, now are quiet again. No, we will not! For too many missing and nothing was done today.
Well, what does this day? Guardian of shows definitely effect as success can not be won this paper directly, this has to happen more. But indirectly these reactions are still a success. But this paper shows appeasement that the Minister of Education and the principals are afraid. Fear that the movement is even stronger, that they still vigorously insists on managing the social and cultural causes of the problems. Maybe they are afraid that the students and the students continue to join forces with their teachers and lecturers, or even, as happened today at the demonstration before, with workers and the unemployed. But no one can stop this process more. The lecturers and teachers will not have to hide with their criticism, they have become one of many that will strengthen the back.
Federal Education Minister Annette Schavan invites the way to Bologna summit in April. Until then, this paper could even implemented, and further steps will be decreased. The contents of the protesters still have to be clearly formulated and articulated the thoughts and ideas need to be further disseminated in the public and discussed and observed the political processes vigilant and well commented. April is probably a good time to review the training again to take to the streets because they are now written on paper and not enough lines of attack at the Jena Unileitung one comes with some concerns probably continue to granite. With small concessions can not be satisfied if the problems at the root (radix - Are packed too radical).
KMK Chairman Henry Tesch (CDU) and HRK-President Margaret Wintermantel emphasized similar to openly display leading officials yesterday Jena panel discussion on the need for cooperation with the students and expressed their belief to find "common workable solutions." The student strike movement to be careful now very pleased that the 'busy' guide members of federal, state and university again not only with a few students from the committees work and continue to play a much more prominent role. It is a dialogue between students and between students and lecturers press ahead with a dialogue of bodies not belonging may be limited. The energy of the protest must be converted into a positive force of action, debate and thought. We can work no longer "them up there," left to their links with cliques and their shared world views are possible only with difficulty thinking and understanding what is being articulated by the protesters for years.
Sources:
HRK press release 10.12.
Focus on 10.12.
radio utopia on the KMK on 10.12.
FDP release 10.12.
GEW press release 10.12.
declaration of solidarity of the Scientific Advisory Board of ATTAC
call for demonstration in Bonn for the Standing Conference
A report from the demo
page KMK demonstration in Bonn
photos from the demo
Klaus Thickness: "The University in the global competition" in the GEW reader to the 13th State Higher Education Conference . Thuringian universities in the maelstrom of financial misery. Erfurt 2005th P. 29-33.
Klaus Dicke: contributions to the panel discussion "From the quality of teaching for quality development as a principle of university management - a location determination. " In: HRK - contributions to the university policy 12/2007 Quality-oriented higher education management and external standards . Contributions to an event of the project Quality Assurance of University Rectors Conference on 2./3.11.2006 in Bonn.
Will Quadriderm Help My Acne
About the existence and criticism of the shape of the panel discussion
On Wednesday the 9th 12. 2009 at noon, a panel discussion between university management, government representatives and student representatives was held. Was triggered by the protests against current educational policy and educational systems that have been expressed in recent weeks on federal and worldwide demonstrations and occupations of classrooms and schools. At the beginning of December, after a month about 70 universities nationwide staffed by students.
First Lecture Hall 1 were then HS 4 and 5, following the demonstration of 17.11. were filled with more than 3,000 people. In the second week, said both the Unileitung and the strikers from their willingness in principle speech. The rector had asked for an interview, but decided the plenary of the occupied classroom, on the one not in secret but in public to talk to each other and the round in equal shares (three representatives) to occupy. The rector refused these conditions however.
beginning the third week turned Rector thickness, the positions on the head, and said he discussed with us only when we are through Thursday would leave the lecture hall. Since this is not a good exchange, a call was rejected by the squatters and for a later date envisaged. By the Unileitung in the press release of 02.12. alleged lack of willingness to talk so not correspond to the facts. a reply from 03.12. sets this dar.
then invited the Unileitung even one at a panel discussion. For the panel proposed the following cast: instead of the required three occupants, only one person, and one s representative for the student councils and the Stura. On the side of Unileitung now two representatives should be on the podium and sit the Secretary of State Thomas Deufel. Beginning of the fourth week brought to break the misconception conveyed triangle communications over the Stura, two representatives to the president personally, the message that we would only participate in a panel discussion when three people were sitting in the student strike on the podium. The rector refused to do so, citing as an impractical size of the podium, but he granted two envoys.
The House on Monday evening, in a five-hour discussion trying to decide the difficult question of how to deal with these circumstances, particularly against the background that the protesters from the Unileitung not as a legitimate voice were recognized, although there were hundreds of signatures, many approvals and thousands of people on the streets. In addition, on Monday announced that the discussion take place at noon and not at the central campus should Abbe. Were in agreement, the participants of the plenum that bring the panel discussion will neither solutions nor an agreement could be negotiated within the meaning of the subject demands. The discussions in recent weeks, a shift in the focus of protest, request to officers and committees, followed Waiting towards achieving democracy at the level of those concerned, the lecturers and teachers. Since neither the main Unileitung hold responsibilities for the desired Verändeurungen the study rules, or the democratic structure of the university holds should still was not clear what one should speak at all. Were unanimous in the strikers and that a panel discussion at the very undemocratic and not a good basis for discussion at eye height.
One can say that in the end, most with a feeling ambivalent, arguing for the participation in the discussion. read to The variant also discussed an informative statement, which was to communicate the rejection of a sub-company, has also been welcomed by many but in favor of the meet, conciliatory Decision discarded.
As the ultimate decision to participate in the panel discussion could not be supported by all, except that they abstained from their veto, was passed a declaration by flyers in the audience. In this declaration, the criticism of the form of panel discussions in general and on this very concrete has been issued. The criticism was shared by the participating advocates. This act shows once again the one hand the heterogeneity of the student strike movement, this is definitely our strength, and the other makes the text of the lecture hall taken place in occupied dividends discourse transparent.
Despite the not very central location (Döbereiner Lecture Hall) and the adverse noon found, more than 200 people, mostly students in the lecture hall. Lecturers were significantly less present, which can be explained in part by a fear of losing face by participating in those activities with the Unileitung - this was given to us over in advance by faculty as a reason for non-participation.
were the end the student strike ends by Tobi crown and Kirsten Limbecker represented. For the Student Council sat the Higher Education Policy Officer Joerg Hänold and for the student councils Matt Haberland. From the Rector were Unileitung Klaus thickness and the Vice President for Academic and structure Kurt-Dieter Koschmieder speaker at the podium. In addition, the incumbent for five weeks Thuringian State for Science and Research Thomas Deufel (SPD), who was previously a professor at the University of Jena was loaded. The discussion was led by Francis ..., the Stura at the University leads the talk line.
As discussed, the squatters in the run-up to expectations and criticisms of this panel discussion had turned out to be correct. A discussion or debate, could not be given the structure of a panel discussion possible. In the available good hour, the speeches were limited to two to four models. Except a criticism earlier views expressed and presenting their own arguments were given little or no counter-statements, expressed reactions or even out in the least debate.
A specific issue was not given, so the panelists responded many issues of education strike, but just not as rough in a marking. The speech was line after a first round of statements that were made mainly for the Bologna reform, its implementation and the resulting study conditions, a question about the prospects of improvement of democracy at the university, which opened the second round of speech. The second issue was tackled financial problems in case their 'answer' gave way on the issue of commodification of the university.
After these rounds podium there was an opportunity for the audience to ask questions and give comments. Unfortunately, due to time limitation and the intent of a question and answer session that led to more talk minutes from the Unileitung, only four contributions possible. A strong criticism from the audience said a student in one of the four speeches, geteiltvom yesterday's plenary, and many visitors to the welcome speech by the authority. While the Unileitung and Secretary of State with "dear" and full names were presented, and student representative bodies at least first names were given, the squatters were simply referred to as such. Noticeable was the outward appearance of particular thickness of Rectors of State Secretary Klaus and Thomas Deufel. From her posture, her rare look at the speakers and their talks said both side of arrogance and a lack of interest in the discussion and the thoughts of students. In the last speech from the audience the speaker had even though it comes to Mr. Big himself and his links with the CHE and Bertelsmann, took this call to listen up.
The discussion was inconclusive, as expected, not only because of the shape and the usual vacuous and soothing Discussion of general procedures and their own efforts on the part of the government representative and the university administration. There can be no discussion of democratic forms, fundamental criticism or reflexive questions are done when one side does not go to the thoughts of others and dismiss questionings and new ideas as spinners contempt.
A critique of the substantive comments of Unileitung are built into the product to Standing Conference and the panel discussion . 
On Wednesday the 9th 12. 2009 at noon, a panel discussion between university management, government representatives and student representatives was held. Was triggered by the protests against current educational policy and educational systems that have been expressed in recent weeks on federal and worldwide demonstrations and occupations of classrooms and schools. At the beginning of December, after a month about 70 universities nationwide staffed by students.
First Lecture Hall 1 were then HS 4 and 5, following the demonstration of 17.11. were filled with more than 3,000 people. In the second week, said both the Unileitung and the strikers from their willingness in principle speech. The rector had asked for an interview, but decided the plenary of the occupied classroom, on the one not in secret but in public to talk to each other and the round in equal shares (three representatives) to occupy. The rector refused these conditions however.
beginning the third week turned Rector thickness, the positions on the head, and said he discussed with us only when we are through Thursday would leave the lecture hall. Since this is not a good exchange, a call was rejected by the squatters and for a later date envisaged. By the Unileitung in the press release of 02.12. alleged lack of willingness to talk so not correspond to the facts. a reply from 03.12. sets this dar.
then invited the Unileitung even one at a panel discussion. For the panel proposed the following cast: instead of the required three occupants, only one person, and one s representative for the student councils and the Stura. On the side of Unileitung now two representatives should be on the podium and sit the Secretary of State Thomas Deufel. Beginning of the fourth week brought to break the misconception conveyed triangle communications over the Stura, two representatives to the president personally, the message that we would only participate in a panel discussion when three people were sitting in the student strike on the podium. The rector refused to do so, citing as an impractical size of the podium, but he granted two envoys.
The House on Monday evening, in a five-hour discussion trying to decide the difficult question of how to deal with these circumstances, particularly against the background that the protesters from the Unileitung not as a legitimate voice were recognized, although there were hundreds of signatures, many approvals and thousands of people on the streets. In addition, on Monday announced that the discussion take place at noon and not at the central campus should Abbe. Were in agreement, the participants of the plenum that bring the panel discussion will neither solutions nor an agreement could be negotiated within the meaning of the subject demands. The discussions in recent weeks, a shift in the focus of protest, request to officers and committees, followed Waiting towards achieving democracy at the level of those concerned, the lecturers and teachers. Since neither the main Unileitung hold responsibilities for the desired Verändeurungen the study rules, or the democratic structure of the university holds should still was not clear what one should speak at all. Were unanimous in the strikers and that a panel discussion at the very undemocratic and not a good basis for discussion at eye height.
One can say that in the end, most with a feeling ambivalent, arguing for the participation in the discussion. read to The variant also discussed an informative statement, which was to communicate the rejection of a sub-company, has also been welcomed by many but in favor of the meet, conciliatory Decision discarded.
As the ultimate decision to participate in the panel discussion could not be supported by all, except that they abstained from their veto, was passed a declaration by flyers in the audience. In this declaration, the criticism of the form of panel discussions in general and on this very concrete has been issued. The criticism was shared by the participating advocates. This act shows once again the one hand the heterogeneity of the student strike movement, this is definitely our strength, and the other makes the text of the lecture hall taken place in occupied dividends discourse transparent.
Despite the not very central location (Döbereiner Lecture Hall) and the adverse noon found, more than 200 people, mostly students in the lecture hall. Lecturers were significantly less present, which can be explained in part by a fear of losing face by participating in those activities with the Unileitung - this was given to us over in advance by faculty as a reason for non-participation.
were the end the student strike ends by Tobi crown and Kirsten Limbecker represented. For the Student Council sat the Higher Education Policy Officer Joerg Hänold and for the student councils Matt Haberland. From the Rector were Unileitung Klaus thickness and the Vice President for Academic and structure Kurt-Dieter Koschmieder speaker at the podium. In addition, the incumbent for five weeks Thuringian State for Science and Research Thomas Deufel (SPD), who was previously a professor at the University of Jena was loaded. The discussion was led by Francis ..., the Stura at the University leads the talk line.
As discussed, the squatters in the run-up to expectations and criticisms of this panel discussion had turned out to be correct. A discussion or debate, could not be given the structure of a panel discussion possible. In the available good hour, the speeches were limited to two to four models. Except a criticism earlier views expressed and presenting their own arguments were given little or no counter-statements, expressed reactions or even out in the least debate.
A specific issue was not given, so the panelists responded many issues of education strike, but just not as rough in a marking. The speech was line after a first round of statements that were made mainly for the Bologna reform, its implementation and the resulting study conditions, a question about the prospects of improvement of democracy at the university, which opened the second round of speech. The second issue was tackled financial problems in case their 'answer' gave way on the issue of commodification of the university.
After these rounds podium there was an opportunity for the audience to ask questions and give comments. Unfortunately, due to time limitation and the intent of a question and answer session that led to more talk minutes from the Unileitung, only four contributions possible. A strong criticism from the audience said a student in one of the four speeches, geteiltvom yesterday's plenary, and many visitors to the welcome speech by the authority. While the Unileitung and Secretary of State with "dear" and full names were presented, and student representative bodies at least first names were given, the squatters were simply referred to as such. Noticeable was the outward appearance of particular thickness of Rectors of State Secretary Klaus and Thomas Deufel. From her posture, her rare look at the speakers and their talks said both side of arrogance and a lack of interest in the discussion and the thoughts of students. In the last speech from the audience the speaker had even though it comes to Mr. Big himself and his links with the CHE and Bertelsmann, took this call to listen up.
The discussion was inconclusive, as expected, not only because of the shape and the usual vacuous and soothing Discussion of general procedures and their own efforts on the part of the government representative and the university administration. There can be no discussion of democratic forms, fundamental criticism or reflexive questions are done when one side does not go to the thoughts of others and dismiss questionings and new ideas as spinners contempt.
A critique of the substantive comments of Unileitung are built into the product to Standing Conference and the panel discussion .
People With The Same Birthday Compa
2009-12-09 panel discussion in Döbereiner auditorium 1h03min,
As promised here the video, youtube, unfortunately, allowed only 10 minutes, from there ..
And woe there is another and said it would only to Bologna, de-democratization, marketization, simulation of the real world of work etc ... all this could mean even Bertels Mania, and it now plays in a pretty hats "package" put together, but was allowed to unpack it "the people" itself
* UPDATE: *
slightly better audio quality ....
December 12th 2009 from Brenna Jent on Vimeo .
Here is the first version:
December 11th 2009 from Där Biltungsstreihk Jänaa on Vimeo . 
As promised here the video, youtube, unfortunately, allowed only 10 minutes, from there ..
And woe there is another and said it would only to Bologna, de-democratization, marketization, simulation of the real world of work etc ... all this could mean even Bertels Mania, and it now plays in a pretty hats "package" put together, but was allowed to unpack it "the people" itself
* UPDATE: *
slightly better audio quality ....
December 12th 2009 from Brenna Jent on Vimeo .
Here is the first version:
December 11th 2009 from Där Biltungsstreihk Jänaa on Vimeo .
What Are Thechances Of Another War
votes to yesterday's panel discussion with the Unileitung
A report yesterday on our part on the panel discussion is to come, enough interesting has come to light ...
A video recording of the panel discussion , at least the first hour will still appear last night on youtube. More pictures to come hopefully in a few days.
OTZ and TLZ write anything.
JenaTV sent today evening, 18 clock it. Every person who was there will say that this report (as in the usual channels) was reduced more than. Of the strikers, we learn virtually nothing about the many sources of criticisms and ideas. Instead, in their own words, the long vacuous excesses of the 'red tape' are summarized so that the 'decision makers' appear benevolent, dutiful and reasonable and make it so much, while the squatters so disturbed only the teaching environment.
such poor journalism prepared people are to herein hardly provide, however:
Campus TV is also presented with a report.
Here two items: the free (t) spaces and jenanews.de
The articles of the open spaces (t) :
Grinseköpfe and Arschkriecher
9th December 2009
in General
noon today took place in the lecture hall Döbereiner a panel discussion with representatives of the UniBesetzerInnen, representatives of Unileitung (Rector and Vice-President), Stura, FSR Representative and the Secretary of State Thomas Deufel instead. Was prompted by its continuing occupation and the requirements of education strikers. There are about 100 to 150 people involved in the discussion.
Unileitung gleamed and Secretary of State is to deny any responsibility for the botched situation. Have alleged Rector thickness, among other things, he had played no role in implementation. This raises the question what he then made in his time at Bertelsmann and the HRK. Also, a general social context of educational problems by Secretary of State, and FSR Unileitung representative was denied again and again. In terms of employment and education, the commodification of Unileitung also seems a more than strange picture to have. Thus the criticism of precarious employment (based on the article jw) strictly rejected, claiming that there was supposedly this latest decision. On the subject of commodification and the associated criticism of the alleged Unirat thickness, business representatives at the university had no control. They would only for the "commercial Restructuring of the management books provide. Even in research funds for "excellence" (not about teaching) thickness provides no problem. That this external funding is almost exclusively come from the business for him, seemingly irrelevant.
was further from the Unileitung and the State Secretary pointed out time and again to the lack of money, so now the administrative fee would not get worse. It was referred to the University of Bamberg, which indeed would have 20 million (!) € more because it charges tuition fees. Should introduce some of the indirect call may be tuition fees in Thuringia? What is the better and the country Unileitung probably not?
Deufel said then, how great it is that by studying the Bolognaprozes more and more high school graduates. Unfortunately, he forgot completely missing the living room and the congested universities. Also, the lack of teaching staff appeared in his speech does not occur. He also pushed the increase in student numbers on the Bologna process. He noted the federal government also indirectly failure on full line. It probably had to first get the EU to "correct" the botched education (whose meaning is in another story). He also claimed, who had studied bachelor and master even more for a semester as a former master's students available. But he forgets that most of the bachelor graduates will take up probably never a master's degree, as neither the capacity nor the Konsekutivität is given.
The demand for more democracy in the universities was dismissed with reference to the existing bodies and the ominous "Bolognatag. The existing bodies to a large extent not give instructions and also relatively transparent work seems Unileitung either not known to be or she sees no reason to change.
the squatters represented on the podium at this point is no criticism to make. Although it was the start of discussions, where a split within the squatters so that some only a written Statement rumreichten and not participating in the discussion. Reason for this was that the discussion is not among the necessary conditions took place, and that thickness (correctly) acts as an illegitimate representative.
To sum up the whole event described as a farce. The representatives of the Unileitung Deufel and indulged in self-congratulation, as they hurled critical questions with reference to the lack of time or choking off empty words in the room. The representatives of these bodies was practicing hard in the ass and called creep, for example, on the institutional channels to cooperate with the university. In addition, solutions according to him quickly and "efficiently" be found. Furthermore, he asked the student representatives indirectly represents the only legitimate representative of the students might not be as articulate students organize themselves and come to solutions.
The references of the squatters that the requirements would be implemented on a democratic basis and not from above, were dismissed so that democracy and decision-making now takes place in time (non-transparent) bodies.
The panel discussion has shown once again that the Unileitung is not willing to cooperate in a direct, grassroots way, with dedicated students. Instead, had problems in bodies that ultimately express only totzuquatschen recommendations.
For basisdemoratische restructuring of all educational institutions! Never again
Unirat! Never again Rector!
Here is the article by jenanews.de
education strike: Much discussion needs
Thursday 10 December 2009, at 12:01
In Jena on Wednesday afternoon for the first time several student representatives and representatives of the university and the policies expressed in a public panel discussion.
A debate has hardly taken place. The parties have instead passed the buck around and pointed the guilt. The start of the event raised hopes of an active Exchange. The seven speakers were mixed, contrary to its position on the merits, not on a particular side of the podium place, but were confused. So dare Professor Kurt-Dieter Koschmieder, Vice President for Academic and structure at the university, between the protesters and Kirsten Limbecker Stura member Jörg Hänold.
was quick, however, that the parties hardly spoke to each other. Arguments were put forward to the next minute again from the opposite side with a "but" abgeschmettert to be.
The two students from among the squatters complained the entire auditorium Bologna Process. "The ideal of a functioning Bologna reform a soap bubble, "said the protester Tobias. A bachelor's degree is no scope for individual design and put the students under enormous pressure to perform. The new Secretary of Science and former Jena Professor Thomas Deufel (SPD) announced that changes were needed. He referred to the first educational policies of the government: The administrative fee has been abolished since Tuesday, and a first degree is free of charge in Thuringia. University Rector Professor Klaus Dicke was the hardly add anything. But he stressed repeatedly that the implementation of the Bologna reforms are student representatives were involved. "These are still in the university policy involved, "he said.
The keyword of participation in higher education attacked the student speakers at you. They look quite a student participation, but without real participation. "The student bodies have neither a vote nor a veto," criticized Tobias and his running mate, Kirsten added: "The university is only determined by economic interests." Rector thickness rejected that accusation.
gave to Vice President Koschmieder that "significant deficiencies" give the Bologna Process. University and students have not been known in the implementation of the reform, which actually means Bologna. He called it addition, the government indirectly, make the universities more money. "In Bavaria, a University of tuition fees EUR 20 million more a year than we have. This must balance the government. "
Matt Haberland, a representative of all student representatives at the FSU Jena called for, not to speak too long about the problems, but to act quickly. "Many students depend, for example, currently legal in the air, because for some courses are still no final examination regulations," he said.
common objectives at the panel discussion could not be worked out. For a non-involved Audience was sometimes unclear what arguments he is to be believed. It should be further discussed. Professor Dick welcomed the proposal of the objectors to establish a round table. Enough talk about is certainly there.
text: Ina Schwansen
As I said, comes from us or something ... 
A report yesterday on our part on the panel discussion is to come, enough interesting has come to light ...
A video recording of the panel discussion , at least the first hour will still appear last night on youtube. More pictures to come hopefully in a few days.
OTZ and TLZ write anything.
JenaTV sent today evening, 18 clock it. Every person who was there will say that this report (as in the usual channels) was reduced more than. Of the strikers, we learn virtually nothing about the many sources of criticisms and ideas. Instead, in their own words, the long vacuous excesses of the 'red tape' are summarized so that the 'decision makers' appear benevolent, dutiful and reasonable and make it so much, while the squatters so disturbed only the teaching environment.
such poor journalism prepared people are to herein hardly provide, however:
Campus TV is also presented with a report.
Here two items: the free (t) spaces and jenanews.de
The articles of the open spaces (t) :
Grinseköpfe and Arschkriecher
9th December 2009
in General
noon today took place in the lecture hall Döbereiner a panel discussion with representatives of the UniBesetzerInnen, representatives of Unileitung (Rector and Vice-President), Stura, FSR Representative and the Secretary of State Thomas Deufel instead. Was prompted by its continuing occupation and the requirements of education strikers. There are about 100 to 150 people involved in the discussion.
Unileitung gleamed and Secretary of State is to deny any responsibility for the botched situation. Have alleged Rector thickness, among other things, he had played no role in implementation. This raises the question what he then made in his time at Bertelsmann and the HRK. Also, a general social context of educational problems by Secretary of State, and FSR Unileitung representative was denied again and again. In terms of employment and education, the commodification of Unileitung also seems a more than strange picture to have. Thus the criticism of precarious employment (based on the article jw) strictly rejected, claiming that there was supposedly this latest decision. On the subject of commodification and the associated criticism of the alleged Unirat thickness, business representatives at the university had no control. They would only for the "commercial Restructuring of the management books provide. Even in research funds for "excellence" (not about teaching) thickness provides no problem. That this external funding is almost exclusively come from the business for him, seemingly irrelevant.
was further from the Unileitung and the State Secretary pointed out time and again to the lack of money, so now the administrative fee would not get worse. It was referred to the University of Bamberg, which indeed would have 20 million (!) € more because it charges tuition fees. Should introduce some of the indirect call may be tuition fees in Thuringia? What is the better and the country Unileitung probably not?
Deufel said then, how great it is that by studying the Bolognaprozes more and more high school graduates. Unfortunately, he forgot completely missing the living room and the congested universities. Also, the lack of teaching staff appeared in his speech does not occur. He also pushed the increase in student numbers on the Bologna process. He noted the federal government also indirectly failure on full line. It probably had to first get the EU to "correct" the botched education (whose meaning is in another story). He also claimed, who had studied bachelor and master even more for a semester as a former master's students available. But he forgets that most of the bachelor graduates will take up probably never a master's degree, as neither the capacity nor the Konsekutivität is given.
The demand for more democracy in the universities was dismissed with reference to the existing bodies and the ominous "Bolognatag. The existing bodies to a large extent not give instructions and also relatively transparent work seems Unileitung either not known to be or she sees no reason to change.
the squatters represented on the podium at this point is no criticism to make. Although it was the start of discussions, where a split within the squatters so that some only a written Statement rumreichten and not participating in the discussion. Reason for this was that the discussion is not among the necessary conditions took place, and that thickness (correctly) acts as an illegitimate representative.
To sum up the whole event described as a farce. The representatives of the Unileitung Deufel and indulged in self-congratulation, as they hurled critical questions with reference to the lack of time or choking off empty words in the room. The representatives of these bodies was practicing hard in the ass and called creep, for example, on the institutional channels to cooperate with the university. In addition, solutions according to him quickly and "efficiently" be found. Furthermore, he asked the student representatives indirectly represents the only legitimate representative of the students might not be as articulate students organize themselves and come to solutions.
The references of the squatters that the requirements would be implemented on a democratic basis and not from above, were dismissed so that democracy and decision-making now takes place in time (non-transparent) bodies.
The panel discussion has shown once again that the Unileitung is not willing to cooperate in a direct, grassroots way, with dedicated students. Instead, had problems in bodies that ultimately express only totzuquatschen recommendations.
For basisdemoratische restructuring of all educational institutions! Never again
Unirat! Never again Rector!
Here is the article by jenanews.de
education strike: Much discussion needs
Thursday 10 December 2009, at 12:01
In Jena on Wednesday afternoon for the first time several student representatives and representatives of the university and the policies expressed in a public panel discussion.
A debate has hardly taken place. The parties have instead passed the buck around and pointed the guilt. The start of the event raised hopes of an active Exchange. The seven speakers were mixed, contrary to its position on the merits, not on a particular side of the podium place, but were confused. So dare Professor Kurt-Dieter Koschmieder, Vice President for Academic and structure at the university, between the protesters and Kirsten Limbecker Stura member Jörg Hänold.
was quick, however, that the parties hardly spoke to each other. Arguments were put forward to the next minute again from the opposite side with a "but" abgeschmettert to be.
The two students from among the squatters complained the entire auditorium Bologna Process. "The ideal of a functioning Bologna reform a soap bubble, "said the protester Tobias. A bachelor's degree is no scope for individual design and put the students under enormous pressure to perform. The new Secretary of Science and former Jena Professor Thomas Deufel (SPD) announced that changes were needed. He referred to the first educational policies of the government: The administrative fee has been abolished since Tuesday, and a first degree is free of charge in Thuringia. University Rector Professor Klaus Dicke was the hardly add anything. But he stressed repeatedly that the implementation of the Bologna reforms are student representatives were involved. "These are still in the university policy involved, "he said.
The keyword of participation in higher education attacked the student speakers at you. They look quite a student participation, but without real participation. "The student bodies have neither a vote nor a veto," criticized Tobias and his running mate, Kirsten added: "The university is only determined by economic interests." Rector thickness rejected that accusation.
gave to Vice President Koschmieder that "significant deficiencies" give the Bologna Process. University and students have not been known in the implementation of the reform, which actually means Bologna. He called it addition, the government indirectly, make the universities more money. "In Bavaria, a University of tuition fees EUR 20 million more a year than we have. This must balance the government. "
Matt Haberland, a representative of all student representatives at the FSU Jena called for, not to speak too long about the problems, but to act quickly. "Many students depend, for example, currently legal in the air, because for some courses are still no final examination regulations," he said.
common objectives at the panel discussion could not be worked out. For a non-involved Audience was sometimes unclear what arguments he is to be believed. It should be further discussed. Professor Dick welcomed the proposal of the objectors to establish a round table. Enough talk about is certainly there.
text: Ina Schwansen
As I said, comes from us or something ...
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Today Gold Price In Mustafa
occupation expected until next week
In plenary on Wednesday of the occupied space in addition to the dividends taken place panel discussion, the question of the occupation and the subsequent planning were discussed.
pending As for the coming days more content and organization of work and early next week, important foundations for medium-term structural Work will be placed, the occupation will continue until mid next week necessarily. 
In plenary on Wednesday of the occupied space in addition to the dividends taken place panel discussion, the question of the occupation and the subsequent planning were discussed.
pending As for the coming days more content and organization of work and early next week, important foundations for medium-term structural Work will be placed, the occupation will continue until mid next week necessarily.
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
First Baby Lohri Invitations
What
By yesterday, the university administration said about your approach to the implementation of the Bologna reform. At least.
The press conference was on Tuesday charged at 10.30 clock in the Senate chamber.
A report by JenaTV:
Other media reports are missing for the hour yet.
As announced, today!
Panel Discussion 12:00 (11:45 ct) BST,
Döbereiner auditorium, Am Steiger 3, 07743 Jena.
you soon 
By yesterday, the university administration said about your approach to the implementation of the Bologna reform. At least.
The press conference was on Tuesday charged at 10.30 clock in the Senate chamber.
A report by JenaTV:
Other media reports are missing for the hour yet.
As announced, today!
Panel Discussion 12:00 (11:45 ct) BST,
Döbereiner auditorium, Am Steiger 3, 07743 Jena.
you soon
Heart Palpitation Stiff Finger
was 9.12. Panel discussion with the Unileitung
On Wednesday there will be a panel discussion:
On the part of students: representatives of student bodies, Stura and the formation of strikers)
On the side of Unileitung: President Klaus thickness and Vice President for doctrine and structure Kurt-Dieter Koschmieder
and the Thuringia State for Science and Research Thomas Deufel
time: 12 clock
Location: Döbereiner auditorium (corner: Steiger - Humboldt Street)
main issues are expected to democracy at the university and its implementation of the Bachelor.
A Note to all students: The rector Spach today the statement to the faculty, to the event and showing how to let go interested.
The panel discussion is not a step to solve the problems but is more likely to positions to make it clear to identify lines of conflict and to place ideas. The actual process can take place only through dialogue and democratic interaction between teachers and students.
invite the evening by 18 clock of the heart to our plenary and open discussion of the results of this panel discussion and advice about the other routes. 
On Wednesday there will be a panel discussion:
On the part of students: representatives of student bodies, Stura and the formation of strikers)
On the side of Unileitung: President Klaus thickness and Vice President for doctrine and structure Kurt-Dieter Koschmieder
and the Thuringia State for Science and Research Thomas Deufel
time: 12 clock
Location: Döbereiner auditorium (corner: Steiger - Humboldt Street)
main issues are expected to democracy at the university and its implementation of the Bachelor.
A Note to all students: The rector Spach today the statement to the faculty, to the event and showing how to let go interested.
The panel discussion is not a step to solve the problems but is more likely to positions to make it clear to identify lines of conflict and to place ideas. The actual process can take place only through dialogue and democratic interaction between teachers and students.
invite the evening by 18 clock of the heart to our plenary and open discussion of the results of this panel discussion and advice about the other routes.
Monday, December 7, 2009
Is My Avocado Tree Dying
today to Tuesday
on Wednesday, on our part, after long deliberation, a panel discussion with the Rector Thickness, the Vice President for Academic and structure Koschmieder, the Secretary of State for Science and Research Deufel, a representative of the student representatives and representatives of the Stura and the active protesters.
So: Invitation to panel discussion on Wednesday, 9.12. by 12 clock in the auditorium Döbereiner.
Who wants to know about the realization of more accurate, may the lecture hall 4 and the House by 18 clock to use tomorrow as a contact and a basis for discussion. A summary will be read again later.
In preparation for today on Tuesday:
- in the morning are flyers and posters printed
- from lunch, they are here> in the lecture hall take them into events, distributes university places and among students, eg in lunch breaks in the cafeteria
- substantive inputs to upgrade with facts, background for debates
- Preparation Hits 16 clock, especially for interested participants in the panel discussion
- 18 Clock House , decision on expatriates, to discuss the topic
- 12 clock: AK supplies
otherwise: the way forward is the days are planned - Initialization of round tables, events and promotions. With power, democracy, diversity and decentralization hot, the gates are open.
The panel discussion is not comparable with the long-term, democratic functioning of the program structure, democratic university structure and implementation of real science in the study, in teaching and research. 
on Wednesday, on our part, after long deliberation, a panel discussion with the Rector Thickness, the Vice President for Academic and structure Koschmieder, the Secretary of State for Science and Research Deufel, a representative of the student representatives and representatives of the Stura and the active protesters.
So: Invitation to panel discussion on Wednesday, 9.12. by 12 clock in the auditorium Döbereiner.
Who wants to know about the realization of more accurate, may the lecture hall 4 and the House by 18 clock to use tomorrow as a contact and a basis for discussion. A summary will be read again later.
In preparation for today on Tuesday:
- in the morning are flyers and posters printed
- from lunch, they are here> in the lecture hall take them into events, distributes university places and among students, eg in lunch breaks in the cafeteria
- substantive inputs to upgrade with facts, background for debates
- Preparation Hits 16 clock, especially for interested participants in the panel discussion
- 18 Clock House , decision on expatriates, to discuss the topic
- 12 clock: AK supplies
otherwise: the way forward is the days are planned - Initialization of round tables, events and promotions. With power, democracy, diversity and decentralization hot, the gates are open.
The panel discussion is not comparable with the long-term, democratic functioning of the program structure, democratic university structure and implementation of real science in the study, in teaching and research.
Sunday, December 6, 2009
Bluetooth Plays Radio
STILL BUSY!
For almost three weeks, we keep the lecture hall 4 on the campus of Jena Ernst-Abbe-occupied. We want to protest against the conditions in education, study and teaching situation at the University of Jena and the shortcomings in democratic participation. The cast of the lecture hall we see a symbolic appropriation of the area of education by all, students and teachers can use for writing and discussion of specific changes.
has in recent weeks taken this process fruit: receivables were carried out to the public, and discussed at a student assembly, students were with us in the exchange, as well as some teachers, in seminars and lectures, and - occurred in open discussion with her students - now in HS 4.
Although emerging in the institutes already strong movement to question the existing teaching systems together with the students and to work, there is still need for protest and debate, for which the occupation of the auditorium is still necessary. We seek a dialogue with the Unileitung and plan for Wednesday a public discussion.
Jena is not alone with this movement. Across Europe, dozens of universities still occupied. The beginning of it all: the rest is up to you! Now is the time for change! Find your own way to endorse the move - in thought, in discussions and in actions. 
For almost three weeks, we keep the lecture hall 4 on the campus of Jena Ernst-Abbe-occupied. We want to protest against the conditions in education, study and teaching situation at the University of Jena and the shortcomings in democratic participation. The cast of the lecture hall we see a symbolic appropriation of the area of education by all, students and teachers can use for writing and discussion of specific changes.
has in recent weeks taken this process fruit: receivables were carried out to the public, and discussed at a student assembly, students were with us in the exchange, as well as some teachers, in seminars and lectures, and - occurred in open discussion with her students - now in HS 4.
Although emerging in the institutes already strong movement to question the existing teaching systems together with the students and to work, there is still need for protest and debate, for which the occupation of the auditorium is still necessary. We seek a dialogue with the Unileitung and plan for Wednesday a public discussion.
Jena is not alone with this movement. Across Europe, dozens of universities still occupied. The beginning of it all: the rest is up to you! Now is the time for change! Find your own way to endorse the move - in thought, in discussions and in actions.
Does Cocoa Butter Clear Dark Marks
THE CONTRIBUTION "evictions (currently) normality in D-Land"
explanation of the term "radical left" in connection with the Bilungsstreik
1) The assignment to a political group is any / m each participant left the educational strikes. The student strike is a heterogeneous movement that critics have united in the current concept of education and thus the education system.
2) The word 'radical' is the Latin term 'radix' (Root) back. In fact, our goal is to tackle a problem at the root.
3) In the current social situation, the educational movement is so well known as the left-wing the next. 
explanation of the term "radical left" in connection with the Bilungsstreik
1) The assignment to a political group is any / m each participant left the educational strikes. The student strike is a heterogeneous movement that critics have united in the current concept of education and thus the education system.
2) The word 'radical' is the Latin term 'radix' (Root) back. In fact, our goal is to tackle a problem at the root.
3) In the current social situation, the educational movement is so well known as the left-wing the next.
Thursday, December 3, 2009
How Far Apart Do Posts Need To Be On A Pole Barn
evictions (currently) Normality in D-Land
On the night of Wednesday to Thursday was cleared unfounded by a brutal police operation in the occupation of the University of Frankfurt. Criminal motions are threatened. Currently, most university occupations are under serious threat of an evacuation, or have already been evacuated.
Students with these experiences are not alone. Nationwide and beyond acquisition projects fought constantly. Squatting and the open spaces of social Rückerorberung have for several decades constant feature of radical left politics. In this experiment (t) s, people build alternative spaces for the autonomous design of lifestyles and culture, and shelter from racism, sexism and homophobia. Such approaches to see has always confronted with repressive accesses the state.
But within the past week, the newly occupied home bowlers in Erfurt were (haendehoch.blogsport.de) , the residential and street art project wells 183 in Berlin (brunnen183.blogsport.de) and market road 138 in Hamburg, under massive police presence cleared. We understand Such attacks also considered attacks on us!
In view of this wave of repression, we would like to hereby express our solidarity with all building projects, to express their self-managed malls and squatters. ONE STRUGGLE ONE FIGHT
- We need to stay! 
On the night of Wednesday to Thursday was cleared unfounded by a brutal police operation in the occupation of the University of Frankfurt. Criminal motions are threatened. Currently, most university occupations are under serious threat of an evacuation, or have already been evacuated.
Students with these experiences are not alone. Nationwide and beyond acquisition projects fought constantly. Squatting and the open spaces of social Rückerorberung have for several decades constant feature of radical left politics. In this experiment (t) s, people build alternative spaces for the autonomous design of lifestyles and culture, and shelter from racism, sexism and homophobia. Such approaches to see has always confronted with repressive accesses the state.
But within the past week, the newly occupied home bowlers in Erfurt were (haendehoch.blogsport.de) , the residential and street art project wells 183 in Berlin (brunnen183.blogsport.de) and market road 138 in Hamburg, under massive police presence cleared. We understand Such attacks also considered attacks on us!
In view of this wave of repression, we would like to hereby express our solidarity with all building projects, to express their self-managed malls and squatters. ONE STRUGGLE ONE FIGHT
- We need to stay!
Free Desk Blue Prints
university administration tried tactical means political activists to defame
In recent days, we observed by the university a most undemocratic and dishonest tactics. The PR office of the Friedrich Schiller University of Jena tried in the public the information to spread, the squatters in Lecture Hall 4 would avoid dialogue with the university administration, during which the University of exactly this dialogue would look. This information is not true and we want this show on the example of a currently planned panel discussion.
On Friday 27 November, informed us of the Student Council on the talks if the university management to us. Proposed was not a joint public conversation, in which 3 representatives of the squatters, 3 representatives and 3 representatives of the student council of regents. The student informed us of another that was called by the university administration an ultimatum for release of the lecture hall, but at the same time we took the press that the university administration claimed to have called an ultimatum.
The plenary lecture in four decided on the same day a change for the planned talks. We do not reject public debates behind closed doors, right in such non-transparent and non-democratic processes, we demonstrate even date! So we invited one of the Unileitung to a panel discussion attended by the public to discuss our demands.
On Tuesday 1 December, we were again on the Student Council a blackmail proposal on the proposed panel discussion: The Unileitung refused to enter into dialogue with us as long as we keep the lecture hall filled. We categorically rejected this proposal. Although the Unileitung in the Public has indicated willingness to talk, she refused to talk to us.
On yesterday we got another offer from the university. We were invited to a panel discussion with a representative of the squatters, a representative of the student representatives and a representative of the Student Council. In contrast to 3 representatives of the University take place. The University is now urging an evacuation of the area and threatens us with a criminal complaint and police clearance. We very much regret if students who are actively committed to improving conditions at the university is threatened with criminal prosecution. However, we are on this approach by Rector BBW from the last strike formation used in which the principal threatened students who occupied his office, with de-registration. Also in this last incident, the university administration lied to the public and tried to blackmail her hand to interpret the part of students.
We explicitly related to false information, some of which were passed by communication problems and by the Sturas, after the protesters were not ready to talk. This statement is fundamentally wrong.
From the press we had seen yesterday that Secretary of State Deufel would now meet with students in Jena. We regret very much that this is not related the occupants is because we have so far received no information about this meeting. Obviously try politics and university leadership to influence public opinion with false information. We warn all the parties expressly lies, this is not a democratic means and will fly up in the short time each time.
Slowly we have enough of contradictory statements on the part of Mr. (thickness), which sits in the largest university political lobbies of the Republic, as well as President in the Coimbra Group . Only last summer, told us Mr. Big he would reject tuition fees, but this appears given the approach of the HRK (HRK) whose Vice President he is just lip service. The HRK advocates including greater involvement of universities in the selection of students, the introduction of tuition fees and the Excellence Initiative of the Federal Government. The HRK operates a number of projects, including the Bologna Center and the project quality management.
She founded jointly with the Bertelsmann Foundation, the nonprofit Center for Higher Education Development (CHE), headquartered in Gütersloh, which was for "University Rankings" even the data of nearly all the students and the public opinion through "studies" and PR Tatkiken manipulated the Department 3 of the University of Siegen (language, literature and media studies), for example taking in July in part not on the CHE-ranking, on the grounds that the procedures give the creeping private companies the ability to control public education in practice and it democratic control to escape. The ranking promotes inequality between schools. It promotes (quote) "the decoupling of research and teaching and to assist in the dismantling of the traditional strengths of German higher education system."
Again in brief:
We want to communicate to communicate claims
The Unileitung
communicates the Unileitung not.
Yours Sincerely
The formation strikers 
In recent days, we observed by the university a most undemocratic and dishonest tactics. The PR office of the Friedrich Schiller University of Jena tried in the public the information to spread, the squatters in Lecture Hall 4 would avoid dialogue with the university administration, during which the University of exactly this dialogue would look. This information is not true and we want this show on the example of a currently planned panel discussion.
On Friday 27 November, informed us of the Student Council on the talks if the university management to us. Proposed was not a joint public conversation, in which 3 representatives of the squatters, 3 representatives and 3 representatives of the student council of regents. The student informed us of another that was called by the university administration an ultimatum for release of the lecture hall, but at the same time we took the press that the university administration claimed to have called an ultimatum.
The plenary lecture in four decided on the same day a change for the planned talks. We do not reject public debates behind closed doors, right in such non-transparent and non-democratic processes, we demonstrate even date! So we invited one of the Unileitung to a panel discussion attended by the public to discuss our demands.
On Tuesday 1 December, we were again on the Student Council a blackmail proposal on the proposed panel discussion: The Unileitung refused to enter into dialogue with us as long as we keep the lecture hall filled. We categorically rejected this proposal. Although the Unileitung in the Public has indicated willingness to talk, she refused to talk to us.
On yesterday we got another offer from the university. We were invited to a panel discussion with a representative of the squatters, a representative of the student representatives and a representative of the Student Council. In contrast to 3 representatives of the University take place. The University is now urging an evacuation of the area and threatens us with a criminal complaint and police clearance. We very much regret if students who are actively committed to improving conditions at the university is threatened with criminal prosecution. However, we are on this approach by Rector BBW from the last strike formation used in which the principal threatened students who occupied his office, with de-registration. Also in this last incident, the university administration lied to the public and tried to blackmail her hand to interpret the part of students.
We explicitly related to false information, some of which were passed by communication problems and by the Sturas, after the protesters were not ready to talk. This statement is fundamentally wrong.
From the press we had seen yesterday that Secretary of State Deufel would now meet with students in Jena. We regret very much that this is not related the occupants is because we have so far received no information about this meeting. Obviously try politics and university leadership to influence public opinion with false information. We warn all the parties expressly lies, this is not a democratic means and will fly up in the short time each time.
Slowly we have enough of contradictory statements on the part of Mr. (thickness), which sits in the largest university political lobbies of the Republic, as well as President in the Coimbra Group . Only last summer, told us Mr. Big he would reject tuition fees, but this appears given the approach of the HRK (HRK) whose Vice President he is just lip service. The HRK advocates including greater involvement of universities in the selection of students, the introduction of tuition fees and the Excellence Initiative of the Federal Government. The HRK operates a number of projects, including the Bologna Center and the project quality management.
She founded jointly with the Bertelsmann Foundation, the nonprofit Center for Higher Education Development (CHE), headquartered in Gütersloh, which was for "University Rankings" even the data of nearly all the students and the public opinion through "studies" and PR Tatkiken manipulated the Department 3 of the University of Siegen (language, literature and media studies), for example taking in July in part not on the CHE-ranking, on the grounds that the procedures give the creeping private companies the ability to control public education in practice and it democratic control to escape. The ranking promotes inequality between schools. It promotes (quote) "the decoupling of research and teaching and to assist in the dismantling of the traditional strengths of German higher education system."
Again in brief:
We want to communicate to communicate claims
The Unileitung
communicates the Unileitung not.
Yours Sincerely
The formation strikers
Wednesday, December 2, 2009
Saturn Water Leak In Trunk
Today's strike
Today's strike has shown that many people do at the University of the discussion about the problems, solution ideas and the established requirements. In many seminars and lectures, debates were held, in part stimulated from outside, partly from the desire of students and / or lecturers themselves
Currently, the events and results of the day collected, a report will therefore there soon.
Please help please, write here in the comments of your events, held discussions, perspectives and possible results, suggestions, criticisms. 
Today's strike has shown that many people do at the University of the discussion about the problems, solution ideas and the established requirements. In many seminars and lectures, debates were held, in part stimulated from outside, partly from the desire of students and / or lecturers themselves
Currently, the events and results of the day collected, a report will therefore there soon.
Please help please, write here in the comments of your events, held discussions, perspectives and possible results, suggestions, criticisms.
Skin Problems Requiring Quadriderm
discussion paper on the requirements for teachers
Jena, 30 November 2009
Dear teachers,
The change in the conditions of study since the implementation of the Bologna reform begins in different dimension to the students auszuwirken. The students are from the work pressure overloaded and look at the same time deprived of any self-design of their studies. Educators and researchers are held by a bureaucratic corset from actual research and teaching. Therefore, the students have chosen a student strike.
These representations of the problems at the university, our demands and the resulting questions we want to give you the opportunity to get involved in this discourse. We hope you use our suggestions for your discussion of the faculties.
With this paper you can on strike (Wednesday, December 2, 2009) connect with students in an exchange to give new impetus to improving education and study in all faculties.
first engaged with regards
The formation strikers
Testing pressure decrease
A central criticism of the education strikers at the current high school and study the situation is connected to the bachelor and master system overload of students. OR is in our view, result provided for by the Bologna reform structure of the program and its poor implementation.
For this reason, we ask:
applied to date in the research world, the maxim "quality over quantity," the brevity of the standard period of Bachelor and Master is no longer the concept of education needs. We therefore urge the increase the standard period of Bachelor to eight semesters. This measure is intended to serve an equalization of the substance and provide a comprehensive, scientifically-forming and not primarily education course.
To lower the test pressure should module examinations combined be. Furthermore, one should refrain from the final grade relevant graded exams in the basic modules . Under the measure would eliminate both questionable methods of quantifying knowledge query such as multiple choice tests, as well as the teachers over-correction effort be spared.
For individual and their own customized services planning the study period and for the optimal examination success to the decentralization and flexibility in the testing procedures be introduced. Concretely this means the ability to independently register for the examination dates, so that can be freely chosen in consequence, whether the examination is written at the beginning or the end of the semester break, and whether a possible re-examination in the following semester can be logged.
Furthermore, the limitation of the official examination attempts be removed in order to reach the state before the introduction of Bachelor and Master degree programs. In addition, ask how long and flexible with a faculty tunable deadlines for papers, which would lead to an increase in the quality of service.
The Senate adopted abolition of the compulsory attendance must now be implemented in all faculties.
us is important to stress that the claims are not on the backs of the already overburdened teachers may be played. Therefore we demand the release of the teachers .
The complexity of the cosmos science 'and the career opportunities after graduation requires a detailed look at the opportunities for study, we therefore call for the introduction and development of a semester orientation.
How would you introduce yourself as a teacher a restructuring of the Bachelor and Master degree programs?
second Financing / excellence initiatives
is currently much discussion about new forms the student loan. Students should, therefore a system of scholarships for the best "benefits" - support - both before and during the promotion. The broad mass of students threatens this empty-handed. decided we reject such a development of elite support from , as this usually represents a confirmation of the prevailing social and economic differences between students. But first we need to balance the social differences among students - Everyone must be encouraged.
lean In this sense we also from an elite education and promotion of higher education, but challenge the required high levels of education and research at all universities and all faculties. We also demand the withdrawal of the FSU Jena excellence initiatives and the general abolition of these initiatives for the formation of elite universities.
The abolition of fees was necessary. However, that is now planned by the university administration, the collection of spare fees, we understand as a ploy against the students and the public. To be perfectly clear, we reject it, for free education through tuition fees, administration fees to pay and the like.
third Free access to higher education
The current gain of entry restrictions by NC, and the division of studies in the financial statements, raises among students on the question of equitable access to higher education. In general, we are in favor of a reduction in restrictions on access to higher education.
Furthermore, we consider specifically the selection solely on the basis of school grades for no adequate assessment of suitability for a course because they did not offer the possibility to include the specific motivations, abilities and talents of applicants with in the approval process and therefore the specific requirements of individual disciplines to be considered in the application process.
Thus we demand:
a free higher education for all. It is controversial whether NichtabiturientInnen is to allow an entrance examination makes sense.
The master's program offers students the opportunity to deepen bachelor's degree in knowledge and skills even further, to specify, and scientifically applied. This was possible in the master's and diploma courses to all students. We demand that all students who are interested in deepening in the form of a Master's program, given the opportunity to complete a master's degree. Master for all.
How do you imagine for an approval process that is managed by the program you just?
Where can master a subject with limited cover really the need for academic staff in your department?
4th Democratic participation
"The Alma Mater Jenensis (...) is the liberal democratic traditions of research and education" . It announced at least the preamble the constitution of the Friedrich-Schiller-University, on 15 May 2007 was adopted by the Senate.
Much of the Improvement and for criticisms of the education strike are directly related to the motion adopted by the bodies of the university systems, especially with the study and examination regulations.
shall decide in accordance with § 25 para 1 sentence 2 of the constitution of the Faculty Council on Promotions, examination and study regulations. The Faculty Council
are classified, according to § 25 para 3 sentence 1 of the constitution of the Dean as chairman, seven high school teachers, only three students and two academic staff .
Since the examination and study regulations, the teaching and studying in a non-separable relationship concern, is facing the students of the Friedrich-Schiller-Universität an important question: to what extent with the composition of the bodies, in particular the relationship of both to the greater part of these systems affected groups (teachers and students), the principle of democratic participation bill?
We therefore demand:
an equal and equally weighted participation of the student body and staff in the committees, especially the faculty, the resulting formed study commission and the Senate.
This is essential to the democratic principles of the above-mentioned research and teaching.
the withdrawal of voting rights for economic agencies of the council
Improving transparency of the bodies.
opened in this context also the question of whether the election of the President (Rector) of the Friedrich-Schiller-University of the democratic principle is justice. We believe that this is not the case.
We therefore call for a primary election of the rector, that is, equal and secret ballot by all members of the university.
universities nationwide are joined by a not legitimated body content in certain directions: Hochschulrektorenkonfernz . We demand its abolition or their transformation into a high school conference, under the democratic participation of students, professors and staff.
As not only the students but also the teachers of the current study conditions affected and excluded by co-decision rights, we want you following also, given our suggestions to the democratization of the Friedrich-Schiller-University, again, some questions for discussion.
As you can see the powers and composition of the University Council?
hold the Rectors' Conference for an adequate voice of the universities?
What do you think of the idea of the rector of the Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena by an equal and secret vote of all members of the university to be elected now?
you see a need to strengthen your voting rights at our university?
are
How to call for a joint participation of students in the senate and faculty councils?
What do you think of an expansion of opportunities for participation of the so-called mid-level faculty and professors, professors who do not benefit status?
5th Teachers and staff at the University
The college is in large part a chronic shortage of teachers, Researchers and also to manage employees, the number of proportion to the number of students at FSU is. This leads to overloading of the employees of the university and also to a deterioration in the quality of teaching, research and relations with students and their own mental and social health. The working conditions are, in our view also often associated with too short contract periods and non-recognition of the actual work involved.
We therefore ask:
must significantly more teachers, professors and staff be set in order to meet the number of students to be at high provide quality teaching and to relieve the teachers for your own research. For this purpose, must be provided by the state more money (so)
re-occupation of vacant apprenticeships be swiftly implemented in accordance with the democratic rights of participation of professors, staff and students. It is necessary to establish that the selection of candidates on experience and qualifications in teaching special emphasis.
All employees of the university must receive fair compensation , which is close to the actual work. Also, consider how contracts respect to their duration are designed to take the constant pressure enough publications etc. to prepare for further employment. A minimum wage must be introduced.
students need to be adjusted and thus the time of the promotion will not be accepted as a scientific study but as a beginning career as an academic staff .
Students and tutors need to get the analog elected student representatives a compensation disadvantage that for them to extend the standard period of study with corresponding consequences for training assistance and long-term course fees means. Moreover, even among them the introduction of a minimum wage demand.
Overall, employees at the university, the University commissioned by the company and the student union an improvement of working conditions absolutely necessary. Without the daily work of cleaning staff, the technical and security staff, including the cafeteria chefs could learn no one do research at the University, or teach. As such, they must be respected in their importance and their useful work and paid accordingly. made
For examination offices urgently needs more staff.
How many staff (lecturers, professors, employees) are missing you at your institute?
How would you wish for themselves and their institute staff the design of the work contracts?
suggest what specific improvements in working conditions before you?
How do you face the often precarious situation of teaching staff?
6th Self-directed study
really is close to the idea that students who want to learn and can be treated at the college as an adult. But the pre-structuring of the course, which is more akin to that of the school, a mature, self-determined students not fair. At the university once the goal was to provide comprehensive education, which includes the self-development, self-organization and the ability to own, critical thinking. We see through the bachelor's degree programs no longer exist.
We therefore ask:
order with the introduction of the bachelor's combat system coincided Verschulungsprozess, should cease to strict structuring of the course . Of course should landmarks and there are a mix of mandatory and optional specifications. The G widest choice of ARRANTY is an important prerequisite for the appropriation of any science.
Among these maximum self-determination in the study as a facilitation of individual focus , a requires time flexibility make, each semester. will provide a free
To study the students, the selection of seminars increased . The aim should be not only a wide range of events, but also enabling a culture of discussion in all subjects by small seminars.
A university study should provide the opportunity study on one's disciplinary boundaries . Without the above freedoms, however, the visit of events in other departments is hardly possible. Should also be given the opportunity, modules across , ie across disciplines, credit leave.
The universities will have to agree among themselves how they can have a true appreciation of the benefits , the exchange between universities in guarantee-and abroad. It should not determine fixed rules on this recognition.
Students must be able to With or self-determination over their own learning goals and content are given. This means not only an appropriate participation in the faculty councils but also an individual consultation with teachers, support the finding of its own themes and Berarbeitungsweisen.
To a certain degree even includes that all subject combinations are studyable , which requires a deployment of adequate capacity.
There are several reasons why people can perceive no full-time study. The part-time study be possible in fact under the condition of individual design of the sequence and the period of part-time study. It also includes an expansion of care for children.
How would you describe the problems that result from a transplanted student life?
Do you think that the current design is the requirement of the Bachelor program of your own science fair?
What other possibilities can there be to reach the ideal of a self-determined studying?
7th Lifestyles
Today's university sees itself as a pioneer of a career . With questionable seminars on key skills and work experience should be our life channeled . We are it is important to stress that the university has done has always been their decisive contribution to the vocational orientation and integration into postgraduate life-world. What room can provide the University for this transition in the corset of the present study structures still available?
We would encourage you to discuss this issue with inclusion of your own life plan in your previous studies. 
Jena, 30 November 2009
Dear teachers,
The change in the conditions of study since the implementation of the Bologna reform begins in different dimension to the students auszuwirken. The students are from the work pressure overloaded and look at the same time deprived of any self-design of their studies. Educators and researchers are held by a bureaucratic corset from actual research and teaching. Therefore, the students have chosen a student strike.
These representations of the problems at the university, our demands and the resulting questions we want to give you the opportunity to get involved in this discourse. We hope you use our suggestions for your discussion of the faculties.
With this paper you can on strike (Wednesday, December 2, 2009) connect with students in an exchange to give new impetus to improving education and study in all faculties.
first engaged with regards
The formation strikers
Testing pressure decrease
A central criticism of the education strikers at the current high school and study the situation is connected to the bachelor and master system overload of students. OR is in our view, result provided for by the Bologna reform structure of the program and its poor implementation.
For this reason, we ask:
applied to date in the research world, the maxim "quality over quantity," the brevity of the standard period of Bachelor and Master is no longer the concept of education needs. We therefore urge the increase the standard period of Bachelor to eight semesters. This measure is intended to serve an equalization of the substance and provide a comprehensive, scientifically-forming and not primarily education course.
To lower the test pressure should module examinations combined be. Furthermore, one should refrain from the final grade relevant graded exams in the basic modules . Under the measure would eliminate both questionable methods of quantifying knowledge query such as multiple choice tests, as well as the teachers over-correction effort be spared.
For individual and their own customized services planning the study period and for the optimal examination success to the decentralization and flexibility in the testing procedures be introduced. Concretely this means the ability to independently register for the examination dates, so that can be freely chosen in consequence, whether the examination is written at the beginning or the end of the semester break, and whether a possible re-examination in the following semester can be logged.
Furthermore, the limitation of the official examination attempts be removed in order to reach the state before the introduction of Bachelor and Master degree programs. In addition, ask how long and flexible with a faculty tunable deadlines for papers, which would lead to an increase in the quality of service.
The Senate adopted abolition of the compulsory attendance must now be implemented in all faculties.
us is important to stress that the claims are not on the backs of the already overburdened teachers may be played. Therefore we demand the release of the teachers .
The complexity of the cosmos science 'and the career opportunities after graduation requires a detailed look at the opportunities for study, we therefore call for the introduction and development of a semester orientation.
How would you introduce yourself as a teacher a restructuring of the Bachelor and Master degree programs?
second Financing / excellence initiatives
is currently much discussion about new forms the student loan. Students should, therefore a system of scholarships for the best "benefits" - support - both before and during the promotion. The broad mass of students threatens this empty-handed. decided we reject such a development of elite support from , as this usually represents a confirmation of the prevailing social and economic differences between students. But first we need to balance the social differences among students - Everyone must be encouraged.
lean In this sense we also from an elite education and promotion of higher education, but challenge the required high levels of education and research at all universities and all faculties. We also demand the withdrawal of the FSU Jena excellence initiatives and the general abolition of these initiatives for the formation of elite universities.
The abolition of fees was necessary. However, that is now planned by the university administration, the collection of spare fees, we understand as a ploy against the students and the public. To be perfectly clear, we reject it, for free education through tuition fees, administration fees to pay and the like.
third Free access to higher education
The current gain of entry restrictions by NC, and the division of studies in the financial statements, raises among students on the question of equitable access to higher education. In general, we are in favor of a reduction in restrictions on access to higher education.
Furthermore, we consider specifically the selection solely on the basis of school grades for no adequate assessment of suitability for a course because they did not offer the possibility to include the specific motivations, abilities and talents of applicants with in the approval process and therefore the specific requirements of individual disciplines to be considered in the application process.
Thus we demand:
a free higher education for all. It is controversial whether NichtabiturientInnen is to allow an entrance examination makes sense.
The master's program offers students the opportunity to deepen bachelor's degree in knowledge and skills even further, to specify, and scientifically applied. This was possible in the master's and diploma courses to all students. We demand that all students who are interested in deepening in the form of a Master's program, given the opportunity to complete a master's degree. Master for all.
How do you imagine for an approval process that is managed by the program you just?
Where can master a subject with limited cover really the need for academic staff in your department?
4th Democratic participation
"The Alma Mater Jenensis (...) is the liberal democratic traditions of research and education" . It announced at least the preamble the constitution of the Friedrich-Schiller-University, on 15 May 2007 was adopted by the Senate.
Much of the Improvement and for criticisms of the education strike are directly related to the motion adopted by the bodies of the university systems, especially with the study and examination regulations.
shall decide in accordance with § 25 para 1 sentence 2 of the constitution of the Faculty Council on Promotions, examination and study regulations. The Faculty Council
are classified, according to § 25 para 3 sentence 1 of the constitution of the Dean as chairman, seven high school teachers, only three students and two academic staff .
Since the examination and study regulations, the teaching and studying in a non-separable relationship concern, is facing the students of the Friedrich-Schiller-Universität an important question: to what extent with the composition of the bodies, in particular the relationship of both to the greater part of these systems affected groups (teachers and students), the principle of democratic participation bill?
We therefore demand:
an equal and equally weighted participation of the student body and staff in the committees, especially the faculty, the resulting formed study commission and the Senate.
This is essential to the democratic principles of the above-mentioned research and teaching.
the withdrawal of voting rights for economic agencies of the council
Improving transparency of the bodies.
opened in this context also the question of whether the election of the President (Rector) of the Friedrich-Schiller-University of the democratic principle is justice. We believe that this is not the case.
We therefore call for a primary election of the rector, that is, equal and secret ballot by all members of the university.
universities nationwide are joined by a not legitimated body content in certain directions: Hochschulrektorenkonfernz . We demand its abolition or their transformation into a high school conference, under the democratic participation of students, professors and staff.
As not only the students but also the teachers of the current study conditions affected and excluded by co-decision rights, we want you following also, given our suggestions to the democratization of the Friedrich-Schiller-University, again, some questions for discussion.
As you can see the powers and composition of the University Council?
hold the Rectors' Conference for an adequate voice of the universities?
What do you think of the idea of the rector of the Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena by an equal and secret vote of all members of the university to be elected now?
you see a need to strengthen your voting rights at our university?
are
How to call for a joint participation of students in the senate and faculty councils?
What do you think of an expansion of opportunities for participation of the so-called mid-level faculty and professors, professors who do not benefit status?
5th Teachers and staff at the University
The college is in large part a chronic shortage of teachers, Researchers and also to manage employees, the number of proportion to the number of students at FSU is. This leads to overloading of the employees of the university and also to a deterioration in the quality of teaching, research and relations with students and their own mental and social health. The working conditions are, in our view also often associated with too short contract periods and non-recognition of the actual work involved.
We therefore ask:
must significantly more teachers, professors and staff be set in order to meet the number of students to be at high provide quality teaching and to relieve the teachers for your own research. For this purpose, must be provided by the state more money (so)
re-occupation of vacant apprenticeships be swiftly implemented in accordance with the democratic rights of participation of professors, staff and students. It is necessary to establish that the selection of candidates on experience and qualifications in teaching special emphasis.
All employees of the university must receive fair compensation , which is close to the actual work. Also, consider how contracts respect to their duration are designed to take the constant pressure enough publications etc. to prepare for further employment. A minimum wage must be introduced.
students need to be adjusted and thus the time of the promotion will not be accepted as a scientific study but as a beginning career as an academic staff .
Students and tutors need to get the analog elected student representatives a compensation disadvantage that for them to extend the standard period of study with corresponding consequences for training assistance and long-term course fees means. Moreover, even among them the introduction of a minimum wage demand.
Overall, employees at the university, the University commissioned by the company and the student union an improvement of working conditions absolutely necessary. Without the daily work of cleaning staff, the technical and security staff, including the cafeteria chefs could learn no one do research at the University, or teach. As such, they must be respected in their importance and their useful work and paid accordingly. made
For examination offices urgently needs more staff.
How many staff (lecturers, professors, employees) are missing you at your institute?
How would you wish for themselves and their institute staff the design of the work contracts?
suggest what specific improvements in working conditions before you?
How do you face the often precarious situation of teaching staff?
6th Self-directed study
really is close to the idea that students who want to learn and can be treated at the college as an adult. But the pre-structuring of the course, which is more akin to that of the school, a mature, self-determined students not fair. At the university once the goal was to provide comprehensive education, which includes the self-development, self-organization and the ability to own, critical thinking. We see through the bachelor's degree programs no longer exist.
We therefore ask:
order with the introduction of the bachelor's combat system coincided Verschulungsprozess, should cease to strict structuring of the course . Of course should landmarks and there are a mix of mandatory and optional specifications. The G widest choice of ARRANTY is an important prerequisite for the appropriation of any science.
Among these maximum self-determination in the study as a facilitation of individual focus , a requires time flexibility make, each semester. will provide a free
To study the students, the selection of seminars increased . The aim should be not only a wide range of events, but also enabling a culture of discussion in all subjects by small seminars.
A university study should provide the opportunity study on one's disciplinary boundaries . Without the above freedoms, however, the visit of events in other departments is hardly possible. Should also be given the opportunity, modules across , ie across disciplines, credit leave.
The universities will have to agree among themselves how they can have a true appreciation of the benefits , the exchange between universities in guarantee-and abroad. It should not determine fixed rules on this recognition.
Students must be able to With or self-determination over their own learning goals and content are given. This means not only an appropriate participation in the faculty councils but also an individual consultation with teachers, support the finding of its own themes and Berarbeitungsweisen.
To a certain degree even includes that all subject combinations are studyable , which requires a deployment of adequate capacity.
There are several reasons why people can perceive no full-time study. The part-time study be possible in fact under the condition of individual design of the sequence and the period of part-time study. It also includes an expansion of care for children.
How would you describe the problems that result from a transplanted student life?
Do you think that the current design is the requirement of the Bachelor program of your own science fair?
What other possibilities can there be to reach the ideal of a self-determined studying?
7th Lifestyles
Today's university sees itself as a pioneer of a career . With questionable seminars on key skills and work experience should be our life channeled . We are it is important to stress that the university has done has always been their decisive contribution to the vocational orientation and integration into postgraduate life-world. What room can provide the University for this transition in the corset of the present study structures still available?
We would encourage you to discuss this issue with inclusion of your own life plan in your previous studies.
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
Tattoos On Mens Genatals
debt (to the press and all)
Jena, 1 December 2009
Dear fellow citizens,
Dear media persons,
The change in the conditions of study since the implementation of the Bologna reform begins in stark Dimensions to our students auszuwirken. We are students of performance pressure overload and see us at the same time deprived of any self-design of our study. Educators and researchers are held by a bureaucratic corset from actual research and teaching. Therefore, we, the students opted for a student strike.
These representations of the problems at the university, our claims, and the resulting questions we want to give you the opportunity to get involved in this discourse. We hope you use our suggestions for your discussion in your family, your circle of friends, at your workplace.
With this paper you can strike at (Wednesday, December 2, 2009) with the students engage in exchange to give new impetus to improving education and study in all faculties.
With committed and sincerely in anticipation to hearing from you
The formation strikers
first Testing pressure decrease
A central criticism of the education strikers at the current high school and study the situation is connected to the bachelor and master system overload of students. OR is in our view, the result intended by the Bologna reform structure of the program and its poor implementation.
For this reason, we ask:
applied to date in the research world, the maxim "quality over quantity," the brevity of the standard period of Bachelor and Master is no longer the concept of education needs. We therefore urge the increase the standard period of Bachelor to eight semesters. This measure is intended to serve an equalization of the substance and provide a comprehensive, scientifically-forming and not primarily education course.
To lower the test pressure should be module examinations combined. In addition to the financial statements should note relevant graded exams in the basic modules be waived. Under the measure would eliminate both questionable methods of quantifying knowledge query such as multiple choice tests, as well as the teachers over-correction effort be spared.
For individual and their own customized services planning the study period and for the optimal examination success to the decentralization and flexibility in the testing procedures be introduced. Concretely this means the ability to independently register for the examination dates, so that can be freely chosen in consequence, whether the check is written at the beginning or the end of the semester break and whether a possible re-examination in the following semester can be logged.
Furthermore, the limitation of the official examination attempts be removed in order to reach the state before the introduction of Bachelor and Master degree programs. In addition, ask how long and flexible with a faculty tunable deadlines for papers, which would lead to an increase in the quality of service.
The Senate adopted abolition of the compulsory attendance must now be implemented in all faculties.
us is important to emphasize that the claims are not on the backs of the already overburdened Teachers may be played. Therefore we demand the release of the teachers .
The complexity of the cosmos science 'and the career opportunities after graduation requires a detailed look at the opportunities for study, we therefore call for the introduction and development of a semester orientation.
second Financing / excellence initiatives
is currently much discussion about new forms of student finance. Students should, therefore a system of scholarships for the best "benefits" - support - both before and during the promotion. The broad mass of students threatens this empty-handed. decided we reject such a development of elite support from , as this usually represents a confirmation of the prevailing social and economic differences between students. But first we need to balance the social differences among students - Everyone must be encouraged.
lean In this sense we also from an elite education and promotion of higher education, but demand the required high levels of education and research at all universities and all faculties. We also demand the withdrawal of the FSU Jena Excellence initiatives and the universal abolition of this Initiatives for the formation of elite universities.
The abolition of fees was necessary. However, that is now planned by the university administration, the collection of spare fees, we understand as a ploy against the students and the public. To be perfectly clear, we reject it, for free education through tuition fees, administration fees to pay and the like.
third Free access to higher education
The current gain of entry restrictions by NC, and the division of studies in the financial statements, raises the question among the students equitable access to higher education. In general, we are in favor of a reduction in restrictions on access to higher education.
Furthermore, we consider specifically the selection solely on the basis of school grades for no adequate assessment of suitability for a course because they did not offer the possibility to include the specific motivations, abilities and talents of applicants with in the approval process and therefore the specific requirements of individual to consider fields in the application process.
Thus we demand:
a free higher education for all. It is controversial whether NichtabiturientInnen to allow an entrance examination makes sense.
The master's program offers students the opportunity to deepen bachelor's degree in knowledge and skills even further, to specify, and scientifically applied. This was possible in the master's and diploma courses to all students. We demand that all students who are interested in deepening in the form of a Master's program, given the opportunity to complete a master's degree. Master for all.
4th Democratic participation
"The Alma Mater Jenensis (...) is the liberal democratic traditions of research and education" . It announced at least the preamble the constitution of the Friedrich-Schiller-University, on 15 May 2007 was adopted by the Senate.
Much of the improvement and criticisms of the education strike are directly related to the motion adopted by the bodies of the university systems, especially with the study and examination regulations.
shall decide in accordance with § 25 para 1 sentence 2 of the constitution of the Faculty Council on Promotions, examination and study regulations. The Faculty Council
are in accordance with § 25 para 3 sentence 1 of the constitution of the Dean as chairman, seven high school teachers, only three students and two academic staff at .
As concerning the examination and study regulations, the teaching and studying in a non-separable relationship raises the students of the Friedrich-Schiller University, an important question: to what extent with the composition of the bodies, in particular the relationship of both to the largest Part of these regulations affected groups (teachers and students), the principle of democratic participation bill?
We therefore demand:
an equal and equally weighted participation of the student body and staff in the committees, especially the faculty, the resulting formed study commission and the Senate.
This is essential for the above democratic principles of research and teaching.
the withdrawal of voting rights for economic agencies of the council
Improving transparency of the bodies.
opened in this context also the question of whether the election of the President (Rector) of the Friedrich-Schiller-University of the democratic principle is justice. We believe that this is not the case.
We therefore call for a primary election of the rector, that is, equal and secret ballot by all members of the university.
Nationwide Universities are not legitimized by a Panel met in substance in certain directions: Hochschulrektorenkonfernz . We demand its abolition or its transformation into a high school conference on democratic participation of students, professors and staff.
As not only the students but also the teachers of the current study conditions affected and excluded by co-decision rights, we want you following also, given our suggestions to the democratization of the Friedrich-Schiller-University, again, some questions for discussion.
5th Teachers and staff at the University
The college is in large part a chronic shortage of teachers, researchers and also to manage employees, their number in proportion to the number of students at FSU stands. This leads to overloading of the employees of the university and also to a deterioration in the quality of teaching, research and relations with students and their own mental and social health. The working conditions are, in our view also often associated with too short contract periods and non-recognition of the actual work involved.
We therefore ask:
must significantly more teachers, Professors and staff be adjusted to the number of students to meet in order to offer high quality teaching and to relieve the teachers for your own research. For this to be provided by the state more money (so)
re-occupation of vacant apprenticeships be swiftly implemented in accordance with the democratic rights of participation of professors, staff and students. It is necessary to establish that the selection of candidates on experience and qualifications in teaching special emphasis.
All employees of the university must receive fair compensation , that the actual amount of work comes close. Also, consider how contracts with respect to their duration are designed to take the constant pressure enough publications etc. to prepare for further employment. A minimum wage must be introduced.
students need to be adjusted and thus the time of the promotion will not be accepted as a scientific study but as a beginning career as an academic staff .
Students and tutors need to get the analog elected student representatives a compensation disadvantage that for them an extension of the standard period of study with corresponding consequences for training assistance and long-term tuition fees means. Moreover, even among them the introduction of a minimum wage demand.
Overall, employees at the university, the University commissioned by the company and the student union an improvement of working conditions absolutely necessary. Without the daily work of cleaning staff, the technical and security staff, including the cafeteria chefs could learn no one do research at the University, or teach. As such, they must be respected in their importance and their useful work and paid accordingly.
For Examination Office urgently needs more staff to be made available.
6th Self-directed study
really is close to the idea that students who want to learn and can be treated at the college as an adult. But the pre-structuring of the course, which is more akin to that of the school, is a mature, self-determined students not fair. At the university once the goal was to provide comprehensive education, which includes the self-development, self-organization and the ability to own, critical thinking. We see through the bachelor's degree programs no longer exist.
We therefore ask
:
the order with the introduction of the bachelor's combat system coincided Verschulungsprozess, , the strict structure of the study eliminated . Of course should landmarks and there are a mix of mandatory and optional specifications. The G ARRANTY widest choice of is an important prerequisite for the appropriation of any science.
Among these maximum self-determination in the study as a facilitation of individual focus, one needs time flexibility, the individual Semester to make. will provide a free
To study the students, the selection of seminars increased . The aim should be not only a wide range of events, but also enabling a culture of discussion in all subjects by small seminars.
A university study should provide the opportunity study on one's disciplinary boundaries . Without the above freedoms, however, the visit of events in other departments is hardly possible. Should also be given the opportunity, modules across , ie across disciplines, credit leave.
The universities will have to agree among themselves how they can have a true appreciation of the benefits , the exchange between universities in ensuring-and abroad. It should not determine fixed rules on this recognition.
Students must be able to With or self-determination over their own learning goals and learning content be given. This means not only an appropriate participation in the faculty councils but also an individual consultation with teachers, support the finding of its own themes and Berarbeitungsweisen.
To a certain degree even includes that all subject combinations studyable are what a deployment requires adequate capacity.
There are several reasons why people can perceive no full-time study. The part-time study be possible in fact under the condition of individual design of the sequence and the period of part-time study. It also includes an expansion of child care.
7th Lifestyles
Today's university sees itself as a pioneer of a career . With questionable seminars on key skills and work experience should be our life channeled . We are it is important to stress that the university has done has always been their decisive contribution to the vocational orientation and integration into postgraduate life-world. What room can provide the University for this transition in the corset of the present study structures still available? 
Jena, 1 December 2009
Dear fellow citizens,
Dear media persons,
The change in the conditions of study since the implementation of the Bologna reform begins in stark Dimensions to our students auszuwirken. We are students of performance pressure overload and see us at the same time deprived of any self-design of our study. Educators and researchers are held by a bureaucratic corset from actual research and teaching. Therefore, we, the students opted for a student strike.
These representations of the problems at the university, our claims, and the resulting questions we want to give you the opportunity to get involved in this discourse. We hope you use our suggestions for your discussion in your family, your circle of friends, at your workplace.
With this paper you can strike at (Wednesday, December 2, 2009) with the students engage in exchange to give new impetus to improving education and study in all faculties.
With committed and sincerely in anticipation to hearing from you
The formation strikers
first Testing pressure decrease
A central criticism of the education strikers at the current high school and study the situation is connected to the bachelor and master system overload of students. OR is in our view, the result intended by the Bologna reform structure of the program and its poor implementation.
For this reason, we ask:
applied to date in the research world, the maxim "quality over quantity," the brevity of the standard period of Bachelor and Master is no longer the concept of education needs. We therefore urge the increase the standard period of Bachelor to eight semesters. This measure is intended to serve an equalization of the substance and provide a comprehensive, scientifically-forming and not primarily education course.
To lower the test pressure should be module examinations combined. In addition to the financial statements should note relevant graded exams in the basic modules be waived. Under the measure would eliminate both questionable methods of quantifying knowledge query such as multiple choice tests, as well as the teachers over-correction effort be spared.
For individual and their own customized services planning the study period and for the optimal examination success to the decentralization and flexibility in the testing procedures be introduced. Concretely this means the ability to independently register for the examination dates, so that can be freely chosen in consequence, whether the check is written at the beginning or the end of the semester break and whether a possible re-examination in the following semester can be logged.
Furthermore, the limitation of the official examination attempts be removed in order to reach the state before the introduction of Bachelor and Master degree programs. In addition, ask how long and flexible with a faculty tunable deadlines for papers, which would lead to an increase in the quality of service.
The Senate adopted abolition of the compulsory attendance must now be implemented in all faculties.
us is important to emphasize that the claims are not on the backs of the already overburdened Teachers may be played. Therefore we demand the release of the teachers .
The complexity of the cosmos science 'and the career opportunities after graduation requires a detailed look at the opportunities for study, we therefore call for the introduction and development of a semester orientation.
second Financing / excellence initiatives
is currently much discussion about new forms of student finance. Students should, therefore a system of scholarships for the best "benefits" - support - both before and during the promotion. The broad mass of students threatens this empty-handed. decided we reject such a development of elite support from , as this usually represents a confirmation of the prevailing social and economic differences between students. But first we need to balance the social differences among students - Everyone must be encouraged.
lean In this sense we also from an elite education and promotion of higher education, but demand the required high levels of education and research at all universities and all faculties. We also demand the withdrawal of the FSU Jena Excellence initiatives and the universal abolition of this Initiatives for the formation of elite universities.
The abolition of fees was necessary. However, that is now planned by the university administration, the collection of spare fees, we understand as a ploy against the students and the public. To be perfectly clear, we reject it, for free education through tuition fees, administration fees to pay and the like.
third Free access to higher education
The current gain of entry restrictions by NC, and the division of studies in the financial statements, raises the question among the students equitable access to higher education. In general, we are in favor of a reduction in restrictions on access to higher education.
Furthermore, we consider specifically the selection solely on the basis of school grades for no adequate assessment of suitability for a course because they did not offer the possibility to include the specific motivations, abilities and talents of applicants with in the approval process and therefore the specific requirements of individual to consider fields in the application process.
Thus we demand:
a free higher education for all. It is controversial whether NichtabiturientInnen to allow an entrance examination makes sense.
The master's program offers students the opportunity to deepen bachelor's degree in knowledge and skills even further, to specify, and scientifically applied. This was possible in the master's and diploma courses to all students. We demand that all students who are interested in deepening in the form of a Master's program, given the opportunity to complete a master's degree. Master for all.
4th Democratic participation
"The Alma Mater Jenensis (...) is the liberal democratic traditions of research and education" . It announced at least the preamble the constitution of the Friedrich-Schiller-University, on 15 May 2007 was adopted by the Senate.
Much of the improvement and criticisms of the education strike are directly related to the motion adopted by the bodies of the university systems, especially with the study and examination regulations.
shall decide in accordance with § 25 para 1 sentence 2 of the constitution of the Faculty Council on Promotions, examination and study regulations. The Faculty Council
are in accordance with § 25 para 3 sentence 1 of the constitution of the Dean as chairman, seven high school teachers, only three students and two academic staff at .
As concerning the examination and study regulations, the teaching and studying in a non-separable relationship raises the students of the Friedrich-Schiller University, an important question: to what extent with the composition of the bodies, in particular the relationship of both to the largest Part of these regulations affected groups (teachers and students), the principle of democratic participation bill?
We therefore demand:
an equal and equally weighted participation of the student body and staff in the committees, especially the faculty, the resulting formed study commission and the Senate.
This is essential for the above democratic principles of research and teaching.
the withdrawal of voting rights for economic agencies of the council
Improving transparency of the bodies.
opened in this context also the question of whether the election of the President (Rector) of the Friedrich-Schiller-University of the democratic principle is justice. We believe that this is not the case.
We therefore call for a primary election of the rector, that is, equal and secret ballot by all members of the university.
Nationwide Universities are not legitimized by a Panel met in substance in certain directions: Hochschulrektorenkonfernz . We demand its abolition or its transformation into a high school conference on democratic participation of students, professors and staff.
As not only the students but also the teachers of the current study conditions affected and excluded by co-decision rights, we want you following also, given our suggestions to the democratization of the Friedrich-Schiller-University, again, some questions for discussion.
5th Teachers and staff at the University
The college is in large part a chronic shortage of teachers, researchers and also to manage employees, their number in proportion to the number of students at FSU stands. This leads to overloading of the employees of the university and also to a deterioration in the quality of teaching, research and relations with students and their own mental and social health. The working conditions are, in our view also often associated with too short contract periods and non-recognition of the actual work involved.
We therefore ask:
must significantly more teachers, Professors and staff be adjusted to the number of students to meet in order to offer high quality teaching and to relieve the teachers for your own research. For this to be provided by the state more money (so)
re-occupation of vacant apprenticeships be swiftly implemented in accordance with the democratic rights of participation of professors, staff and students. It is necessary to establish that the selection of candidates on experience and qualifications in teaching special emphasis.
All employees of the university must receive fair compensation , that the actual amount of work comes close. Also, consider how contracts with respect to their duration are designed to take the constant pressure enough publications etc. to prepare for further employment. A minimum wage must be introduced.
students need to be adjusted and thus the time of the promotion will not be accepted as a scientific study but as a beginning career as an academic staff .
Students and tutors need to get the analog elected student representatives a compensation disadvantage that for them an extension of the standard period of study with corresponding consequences for training assistance and long-term tuition fees means. Moreover, even among them the introduction of a minimum wage demand.
Overall, employees at the university, the University commissioned by the company and the student union an improvement of working conditions absolutely necessary. Without the daily work of cleaning staff, the technical and security staff, including the cafeteria chefs could learn no one do research at the University, or teach. As such, they must be respected in their importance and their useful work and paid accordingly.
For Examination Office urgently needs more staff to be made available.
6th Self-directed study
really is close to the idea that students who want to learn and can be treated at the college as an adult. But the pre-structuring of the course, which is more akin to that of the school, is a mature, self-determined students not fair. At the university once the goal was to provide comprehensive education, which includes the self-development, self-organization and the ability to own, critical thinking. We see through the bachelor's degree programs no longer exist.
We therefore ask
:
the order with the introduction of the bachelor's combat system coincided Verschulungsprozess, , the strict structure of the study eliminated . Of course should landmarks and there are a mix of mandatory and optional specifications. The G ARRANTY widest choice of is an important prerequisite for the appropriation of any science.
Among these maximum self-determination in the study as a facilitation of individual focus, one needs time flexibility, the individual Semester to make. will provide a free
To study the students, the selection of seminars increased . The aim should be not only a wide range of events, but also enabling a culture of discussion in all subjects by small seminars.
A university study should provide the opportunity study on one's disciplinary boundaries . Without the above freedoms, however, the visit of events in other departments is hardly possible. Should also be given the opportunity, modules across , ie across disciplines, credit leave.
The universities will have to agree among themselves how they can have a true appreciation of the benefits , the exchange between universities in ensuring-and abroad. It should not determine fixed rules on this recognition.
Students must be able to With or self-determination over their own learning goals and learning content be given. This means not only an appropriate participation in the faculty councils but also an individual consultation with teachers, support the finding of its own themes and Berarbeitungsweisen.
To a certain degree even includes that all subject combinations studyable are what a deployment requires adequate capacity.
There are several reasons why people can perceive no full-time study. The part-time study be possible in fact under the condition of individual design of the sequence and the period of part-time study. It also includes an expansion of child care.
7th Lifestyles
Today's university sees itself as a pioneer of a career . With questionable seminars on key skills and work experience should be our life channeled . We are it is important to stress that the university has done has always been their decisive contribution to the vocational orientation and integration into postgraduate life-world. What room can provide the University for this transition in the corset of the present study structures still available?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)